FISA terrorism changes debated at House Intelligence hearing

[JURIST] During an uncommon open session [PDF witness list] of the US House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, several legal heavyweights debated whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [text] should be revamped to meet the challenges presented by terrorism. Under the current procedure authorized by FISA, the US Justice Department (DOJ) must seek a warrant from the court established by FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) [FJC backgrounder], before using a wiretap. Judge Richard Posner [academic website] of the US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals suggested that while the warrant process works well when a crime has already been committed, the burden of proof required to secure a warrant is often insurmountable when the goal of intelligence-gathering is merely to identify potential terrorists. American Bar Association (ABA) President Michael Greco [ABA profile] warned the panel that easing the burdens of proof required to conduct surveillance would undermine the protections of the Fourth Amendment [text].

The committee's ranking minority member, Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), introduced a bill [HR 5371 summary; Harman statement] in May that would reinforce the principle that FISA is the proper means "by which domestic electronic surveillance may be conducted." That bill has the support of 60 Democratic co-sponsors. Several Committee Republicans on Tuesday introduced a competing bill [press release] (HR 5825, text not yet available) to update FISA. That legislation would replace current language with "technology-neutral" terms, shift FISA's focus from how surveillance is to be accomplished to whether probable cause exists to conduct a search at all, and provides the president with the ability to circumvent FISA altogether in the event of a terrorist attack. Last week, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) announced that President Bush had agreed to allow FISC oversight of the NSA domestic surveillance program [JURIST report]. CNET News has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.