Milberg Weiss trial delayed as five judges withdraw

[JURIST] The kickback fraud case against leading class action law firm Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman [firm website] has hit unexpected delays as five judges from the US District Court for the Central District of California [official website], which covers Los Angeles, have recused themselves from the case. The five recusals have been attributed to owning stock in a company sued by Milberg Weiss in the past, having approved attorneys fees in a suit brought by Milberg Weiss, and for having been supported by a former Milberg partner when appointed to the federal bench. Federal statute 28 USC 455 [text] requires federal judges to recuse themselves from any case where their impartiality may be reasonably questioned. The arraignments of two defendants who have agreed to plead guilty [Reuters report] have been postponed until Judge John F. Walter is ready to proceed.

The firm faces a 20-count indictment [PDF text; JURIST report] on charges that the firm and name partners David J. Bershad and Steven G. Schulman [statements] paid up to $11.3 million since 1984 to individuals to serve as lead plaintiffs in class-action and shareholder derivative lawsuits. Milberg Weiss allegedly concealed the payments as cash or transferred the payments through other law firms. One lawyer pleaded guilty to funneling money [JURIST report] to a lead plaintiff last month. The Los Angeles Times has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.