JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Monday, May 29, 2006

US reports 75 Guantanamo prisoners on revived hunger strike
Cathy J. Potter at 1:45 PM ET

[JURIST] The US military said Monday that the number of Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees participating in a hunger strike has increased from 3 to about 75. Navy Cmdr. Robert Durand described the strike as an effort to attract attention. He speculated that it may be related to the events of May 18 [JURIST report], when 4 detainees supposedly attempted to commit suicide and several other detainees attacked US soldiers who tried to intervene. According to Durand, quoted by AP, “The hunger strike is consistent with al-Qaida practice and reflects detainee attempts to elicit media attention to bring international pressure on the United States to release them back to the battlefield.” Rights lawyers suggest, however, that the action may be a sign of increased frustration and desperation by inmates at the camp, only 10 of whom have been charged to date.

The latest wave of hunger strikes at Guantanamo began in July 2005, with fifty-two detainees reported to be on strike [JURIST report]. By September the numbers had burgeoned to 128 or more [JURIST report]. In February 2006, faced with aggressive force-feeding measures [JURIST report], including strapping prisoners into restraint chairs for extended periods of time to enable them to be fed through tubes and to prevent them from deliberately vomiting afterward, the numbers had dwindled to 3 or 4. The military has maintained that such measures were “safe and humane” [AFPS report]. The World Medical Association opposes the use of forced feeding as coercive [policy statement]. AP has more.






Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 US House votes for 20-week abortion ban
3:57 PM ET, June 19

 UK Supreme Court allows families of Iraq soldiers to sue government
2:28 PM ET, June 19

 AI: China mining companies contributing to Congo rights abuses
12:51 PM ET, June 19

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org