 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, May 18, 2006 |
 |
|


Judge dismisses el-Masri CIA rendition suit on state secrets grounds
Bernard Hibbitts on May 18, 2006 7:18 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal judge Thursday dismissed [order, PDF] a highly-publicized lawsuit [materials] brought by the ACLU against CIA Director George Tenet and other agency officials and employees on behalf of Khalid El-Masri [JURIST news archive], a German national who alleges [el-Masri statement] that he was kidnapped in Macedonia in 2003 in an instance of extraordinary rendition [JURIST news archive], held by the CIA in Afghanistan where he was subjected to inhumane conditions and coercive interrogation, and finally released in 2004 and dropped off in Albania without ever being charged. Government attorneys argued [JURIST report] last week before US District Judge T.S. Ellis that the suit could jeopardize US national security interests by exposing CIA methods and activities to the general public, and presented a classified affidavit [public version, PDF text] by former CIA director Porter Goss asserting the executive privilege of the president to protect US state and military secrets. In his decision, Ellis acknowledged that dismissing the suit "deprives el-Masri of an American judicial forum for vindicating his claims", but insisted that "el-Masri's private interests must give way to the national interest...".
The US Supreme Court established the state secrets privilege in the 1953 case United States v. Reynolds [opinion text]. The government invoked the privilege [News Media & The Law commentary] in only four cases between 1953 and 1976, but it has been invoked more than 20 times since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and at least five times in the past year, counting the el-Masri case. El-Masri, a father of five, had sought $75,000 in damages, which his lawyer had suggested could be dropped in exchange for a personal apology from Tenet. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

CIA nominee stresses legality of NSA wiretapping during confirmation hearing
Joshua Pantesco on May 18, 2006 6:26 PM ET

[JURIST] General Michael Hayden [official profile] defended the legality of the NSA's domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive] Thursday and said that the program was a critical tool in tracking down terrorists, in testimony during his confirmation hearing [full transcript, PDF] before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence [official website] on his nomination as CIA director. Though Hayden, who headed the NSA from 1999-2005, answered questions on the NSA's warrantless wiretaps of certain domestic communications, he refused to answer questions during the public hearing about reports that the NSA has collected millions of phone records [JURIST report] from US phone companies.
Hayden said Thursday that he initially had reservations about the domestic surveillance program's legality [Chicago Tribune report], but that he became convinced it was lawful after discussions with several Bush administration officials, including then-CIA director George Tenet and then-Attorney General John Ashcroft. Hayden testified that a 2001 Ashcroft memo, which Hayden said he hadn't read, provided the legal basis for the eavesdropping program and that the NSA moved forward with the program in October 2001. In his opening statement [PDF text], Hayden said that as NSA head he worked to fight terrorism in a manner consistent with American values, and said he'd do the same at the helm of the CIA: In return, I vow that, if confirmed, we will dedicate ourselves to strengthening the American public's confidence and trust in the CIA and re-establishing the Agency's "social contract" with the American people, to whom we are ultimately accountable. The best way to strengthen the trust of the American people is to earn it by obeying the law and showing what is best about America. ...
And while the bulk of the Agency's work must, in order to be effective, remain secret, fighting the "long war" on the terrorists who seek to do us harm requires that the American people and their elected representatives know that the CIA is protecting them effectively - and in a way consistent with the core values of our nation. I did that at NSA and, if confirmed, I pledge to do it at CIA. In addition to expressing skepticism about the scope of the NSA wiretapping program, several Senators seemed concerned about Hayden's military ties to the Pentagon, which could conflict with his civilian duties at the CIA. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Annan says Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty faces crisis
Jaime Jansen on May 18, 2006 5:04 PM ET

[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned in a speech delivered in Japan Thursday that the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [UN backgrounder] faces a twin crisis of "confidence and complicity": The Treaty embodies a contract between the nuclear weapon States and the rest of the international community. The former committed themselves to move towards general disarmament, and to refrain from threatening the non-nuclear States with nuclear weapons, while facilitating their access to nuclear energy. In return, the latter committed themselves not to acquire or manufacture nuclear weapons, and to accept on-site verification.
Today, each of these pillars has been put into doubt. While some progress toward disarmament has taken place, nuclear weapons worldwide still number in the thousands, many of them on hair-trigger alert. Moreover, the emphasis seems to have shifted towards having fewer, but more potent weapons, and current politico-military thinking seems to embrace the notion of using such weapons in conflict.
To these old challenges have been added new ones, above all the vulnerability exposed by the extensive trafficking in nuclear technology and know-how, by the scientist A.Q. Khan and others. Perhaps most damaging of all, there is also a perception that the possession of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction offers the best protection against being attacked.
All of this undermines the Treatys integrity and authority. If we want to avoid a cascade of nuclear proliferation, we need a major international effort to strengthen the regime before it is too late. Annan took the international community to task for missing two chances to strengthen the treaty last year by according the International Atomic Energy Agency [official website] more inspection power and providing more incentives to states to forego enrichment, and said that tenacious diplomacy was needed to address nuclear issues presented by developments in the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea [JURIST news archive] and Iran [JURIST news archive], the two latest countries said to possess or be seeking nuclear weapons.
Annan complimented Japan [JURIST news archive] on its adherence to the NPT, and held the country up as a model for countries that do not need nuclear weapons for greatness. But he also observed:We seem to have reached a crossroads. Before us lie two very divergent courses. One path can take us to a world, in which the proliferation of nuclear weapons is restricted and reversed, through trust, dialogue and negotiated agreement, with international guarantees ensuring the supply of nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes, thereby advancing development and economic well-being.
The other path leads to a world, in which a rapidly growing numbers of States feel obliged to arm themselves with nuclear weapons, and in which non-State actors acquire the means to carry out nuclear terrorism. The international community seems almost to be sleepwalking down the latter path -- not by conscious choice, but rather through miscalculation, sterile debate and the paralysis of multilateral mechanisms for confidence-building and conflict-resolution. The UN News Center has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Reinstated Nepal parliament strips king of powers in aftermath of direct rule
Kiran Chapagain on May 18, 2006 12:21 PM ET

[JURIST] In an historic proclamation approved [recorded video] Thursday, Nepal's reinstated parliament stripped all the privileges and powers of King Gyanendra [official profile; BBC profile], who gave up direct rule of the country after 19-days of mass protests [JURIST news archive] in April. The proclamation effectively makes Nepal's 237-year old monarchy ceremonial and recognizes the Nepali people as the source of the state power after a 50-year struggle. Nepal's pro-democracy parties have been demanding the monarchy become ceremonial since 1950 when democracy was first established. On two occasions since, Nepal's kings have taken over control of the government. The Nepalese parliament also declared itself as sovereign and supreme, taking precedence over the constitution [text]. According to the proclamation, Gyanendra, who seized power [JURIST report] in a bloodless coup in February 1, 2005, is now no longer the supreme commander of the 100,000-strong army. In addition, the parliament stripped the monarch of the privilege to choose the heir to the throne and amend laws related to the succession to the throne.
"The House of the Representatives (parliament) will have the right to formulate, amend or annul the law related to the succession to the throne," reads the proclamation, dubbed the Nepali magna carta, which was passed by a voice vote by Nepalese parliamentarians. The king will no longer be a part of the parliament, whereas before Thursday, Nepal's parliament constituted the House of Representatives, an upper house and the king. Parliament will decide the expenses and privileges of the king and the king will have to now pay taxes on his private property and income.
"From now on, the king can be questioned in a court of law," said the proclamation. Earlier, the king was not subject to law of Nepal. The parliament also scrapped the king's advisory body that was in controversy after the royal takeover in February, 2005. Many believed that the body encouraged the king to assume executive power in 2005. eKantipur.com has more.
Kiran Chapagain is a special correspondent for JURIST writing from Nepal. He is an Assistant Senior Reporter for the Kathmandu Post.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

SEC rejects Sarbanes-Oxley rules exemption for small companies
James M Yoch Jr on May 18, 2006 11:04 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Securities and Exchange Commission [official website] has said that all public companies, regardless of their size, must eventually comply with rules [press release] implementing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [text, PDF], which is designed to protect investors. The decision Wednesday follows months of requests by small and mid-size businesses for an exemption from the rules, which could be prohibitively expensive, and two extensions [JURIST report] granted by the SEC for compliance by smaller companies. SEC Chairman Christopher Cox [official profile] said that smaller companies will be granted an extension of a few months once the final rules are released and that the agency will provide detailed guidance for compliance to smaller businesses to prevent unnecessary costs. Cox also affirmed that the SEC would coordinate with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board [official website], which announced a four-point plan [press release] on Wednesday regarding revisions of the existing internal control standards.
The rules, which require public companies to implement internal controls to ensure accurate financial reporting and to seek confirmation of the controls by an external auditor, have prompted many small businesses to go private [JURIST report] in order to avoid the costs of compliance, according to a recent report [text, PDF] from the Government Accountability Office [official website]. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush campaigner sentenced in New Hampshire phone jamming case
Joshua Pantesco on May 18, 2006 10:53 AM ET

[JURIST] James Tobin [SourceWatch profile], President Bush's 2004 campaign chairman for New England, has been sentenced to 10 months in prison [press release] after being convicted [press release] in December for his involvement in jamming phone lines to block Democratic voting drives [JURIST report] during the 2002 Senate election in New Hampshire. In that race, the Republican candidate, Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) [official website], beat Democratic challenger Jeanne Shaheen by less than five percentage points. In handing down the sentence, US District Court Judge Steve McAuliffe told Tobin that "people in your position need to know they cannot do these things and if they do the consequences are very, very serious." Tobin maintained his innocence throughout the trial, claiming to have no knowledge of the 800 hang-up phone calls that were placed to interfere with Democratic get-out-the-vote campaigns. Tobin's request for bail was denied, and he was also fined $10,000 and given two years probation.
Tobin's lawyers were hired by the Republican National Committee [JURIST report] from the prestigious firm Williams & Connelly, and have been paid over $2.5 million in compensation. The former executive director of the New Hampshire Republican Party has been sentenced to seven months in prison [NHPR report] for planning the scheme, and the ex-president of a Republican consulting firm is now serving a five month sentence [Washington Post report] for persuading a telemarketing company to make the calls. Tobin plans to appeal the sentence. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thousands march to protest shooting of Turkish judges over headscarf ruling
James M Yoch Jr on May 18, 2006 9:02 AM ET

[JURIST] Thousands of Turks marched in Ankara on Thursday to denounce the shooting of five judges [JURIST report] Wednesday in the Council of State [official website], Turkey's highest administrative court. The judges were shot by an attacker, reported to be a lawyer, who disagreed with a recent ruling made by the court denying a promotion to a teacher because she wore a religious headscarf. The march led to the mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk [Wikipedia profile], the founder of the modern secular Turkey who outlawed religious dress [JURIST news archive] in many public places, where the protesters wept over the attack and endorsed Turkey's secularism. The shooting and Thursday's march highlighted the tension [AP report] between the secular population and the pro-Islamist government led by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan [official website], whose wife is banned from state functions because she wears a headscarf and who vehemently criticized [JURIST report] the ruling that prompted the gunman.
According to reports, Turkish authorities detained two people on Thursday in addition to the gunman, who was captured immediately after the shooting. Judge Mustafa Yucel Ozbilgin died on Wednesday after undergoing surgery to remove a bullet from his brain, and one other judge is reported to be in intensive care. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rumsfeld says no agreement yet on revised Army interrogation manual
James M Yoch Jr on May 18, 2006 8:32 AM ET

[JURIST] US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld [official profile] confirmed Wednesday that military officials are conflicted about the specific guidelines on interrogation techniques [JURIST report] to be included in a new Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation [current text] during a hearing with the Defense Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee [official website]. Defense officials are struggling over whether to include different standards for prisoners of war, who are protected by the Geneva Convention [text], and enemy combatants, such as those held at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] who the Bush administration has said are not entitled to Geneva Convention protections. Rumsfeld did not say if the standards for interrogation would be the same for all prisoners, but he did assure the subcommittee that all techniques would comply with US law. Further delaying the release of the manual, military officials have also considered classifying portions [JURIST report] of the manual in order to prevent enemies from preparing against specific techniques; but Armed Services Committee members and rights activists have raised concerns that by keeping this information classified, there is no way to ensure that the guidelines fall within the bounds of US and international law.
The Pentagon has been working on a new version of the manual since the prisoner abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib [JURIST news archive] surfaced in 2004. The delays in its release have been attributed to attempts to legitimize different interrogation techniques and allow the army to effectively obtain timely information from prisoners on the battlefield, while complying with the Detainee Treatment Act [JURIST document], a measure passed by Congress last year that explicitly prohibits any cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of persons in custody of the US government. Earlier this month, the Senate Armed Services Committee approved an amendment [JURIST report] to the 2007 military spending bill which would require "a US government coordinated legal opinion on whether certain specified interrogation techniques would constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005." The call for a legal opinion has not yet become law. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|