 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, May 16, 2006 |
 |
|


Australian news organizations slam new sedition laws
Joshua Pantesco on May 16, 2006 12:03 PM ET

[JURIST] Australia's three major news organizations have submitted a joint report to the Australian Law Reform Commission [official website; sedition materials], the independent federal statutory agency charged with conducting official inquiries into areas for possible legal reform, slamming the late 2005 enactment [JURIST report] of the new federal sedition laws [summary] as part of sweeping anti-terrorism legislation [text]. Fairfax, the publisher of Melbourne's The Age, News Ltd. and Australian Associated Press [media websites] said that the laws dealing with incitement of terrorists are excessive and should not be applied to major Australian media outlets.
The publishers expressed concern that they could be found guilty of sedition by printing quotations from groups or individuals that criticize Australian or US policies in Iraq or elsewhere if the quotes are found by a court to provide support for terrorists, or if the quotes are found to "urge" communal violence threatening the peace, order and good government of Australia, which are both criminalized by the new sedition laws. Furthermore, the publishers insist that the good faith defense afforded by the new law would not necessarily provide adequate protection to news outlets, as good faith could be impossible to prove. The Law Reform Commission is actively soliciting public comment on the sedition laws, and the Australian government has insisted that criticism of the law will be duly considered. AAP has more. International press freedom group Article 19 [advocacy group] has also made a submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission criticizing the new laws [PDF].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam lawyers open defense with witness testimony
James M Yoch Jr on May 16, 2006 10:56 AM ET

[JURIST] Defense witnesses began testifying Tuesday in the trial of Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive], following Monday's reading of formal charges [JURIST report] against the deposed Iraqi leader and seven co-defendants for murder, torture, and the illegal arrests of 399 people in Dujail as part of a crackdown in the town after an assassination attempt on Hussein's life. Witnesses, who were unidentified and included some relatives of the defendants, testified while concealed behind a curtain. Hussein and four of the co-defendants were not in the courtroom on Tuesday during the witness testimony, but presiding Judge Raouf Abdel-Rahman [BBC profile] said that the presence of Hussein's lawyers ensured fairness in the proceedings.
After being formally charged yesterday, Hussein and his co-defendants refused to enter a plea and Hussein insisted that he remained the leader of Iraq and claimed the trial was illegal. Abdel-Rahman entered not guilty pleas on their behalf. Under Iraqi criminal law [summary, PDF; Iraqi Criminal Procedure Code, PDF], defendants are not formally charged until after the prosecution has presented its evidence; but once they are charged, the defendants have the burden of disproving the charges against them. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

New York City sues gun dealers for illegal sales
James M Yoch Jr on May 16, 2006 9:45 AM ET

[JURIST] New York City has filed a lawsuit [press release] against 15 rogue out-of-state gun dealers in an attempt to stymie the influx of weapons into New York, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Monday. The suit, which was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York [official website], seeks to compel the dealers to undergo mandatory training, and to pay compensatory damages to the city and punitive damages to victims. The lawsuit also requests the appointment of a special investigator to monitor the dealers. The dealers named in the complaint reside in Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia.
City law enforcement tracked guns used in crimes back to the dealers. Private investigators hired by the city uncovered the allegedly unlawful selling practices by making undercover purchases from those dealers. The suit claims that the dealers allowed straw purchases where one person fills out the necessary paperwork, while another person, who has not undergone the requisite background check, pays for and receives the gun. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russia judge delivering Beslan verdict rules hostage-taker terrorist
James M Yoch Jr on May 16, 2006 9:39 AM ET

[JURIST] A Russian judge on Tuesday said that Nurpashi Kulayev [Wikipedia profile] participated in the September 2004 Beslan school siege [BBC backgrounder; MosNews report], committing an act of terrorism, but has not yet issued a final verdict on Kulayev's guilt. Kulayev, who is the sole surviving attacker from the siege, pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to terrorism and murder charges, denied [JURIST report] killing anyone during the attack, and claimed that he was forced to participate in the siege by terrorists. Although prosecutors requested the death penalty [JURIST report], any such verdict would be changed into life imprisonment because the country has placed a moratorium on capital punishment. The judge began reading the verdict in the case Tuesday, a process which could last several days.
Critics of the trial, including survivors and victims' families, seek further investigation into the tragedy to uncover fault within the government's response, including disorganized medical care, lack of resources, and the use of heavy artillery before all hostages were rescued. The government admitted that negligence contributed to the effects of the tragedy, but did not implicate any specific government employees. The Voice of Beslan [advocacy website, in Russian], a group of activist survivors, spoke out against the reinstatement of the death penalty so that Kulayev can aid a probe into the siege. Reuters has more. MosNews has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

FCC chief calls for probe of domestic phone records turnover to NSA
James M Yoch Jr on May 16, 2006 8:19 AM ET

[JURIST] Federal Communications Commission [official website] chief Michael J. Copps said Monday that the agency should investigate [statement, DOC] the access to domestic customers' phone records [USA Today report; JURIST report] allegedly granted to the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website] by telecommunications giants Verizon, AT&T, and BellSouth [corporate websites]. Reacting to reports that the companies complied with NSA requests to look at the records, Copps said that "protecting the security of the American people is our government's number one responsibility" and that a probe was necessary to determine whether a violation of Section 222 [text] or any other provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 [text] occurred. On Thursday, US Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that he would call on the phone companies [Reuters report] implicated in the USA Today report to provide information to the committee on the allegations, while President Bush defended [JURIST report] domestic surveillance activities. AP has more.
BellSouth said Monday that it cannot find any proof [AP report] that the company turned over records to the NSA. A company spokesperson also said that an internal review uncovered no evidence that BellSouth was even contacted by the NSA. According to reports, Qwest Communications [corporate website], a regional Bell based in Denver, did not allow the NSA to access its customer records. Meanwhile AT&T and Verizon have neither confirmed nor denied the veracity of the allegations against them.
Meanwhile, lawyers have filed suit in New York federal court against Verizon for its alleged involvement in the disclosure of phone records. The suit, brought Friday, claims violations of the Telecommunications Act and the Stored Communications Act of 1986 [text]. Verizon could be fined up to $1,000 for every violation of the Telecommunications Act. The attorneys, who seek to certify the suit as a class action, are considering joining AT&T as a defendant. AT&T already faces a class action lawsuit filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation [advocacy website] because the company allegedly allowed the NSA to use its infrastructure [JURIST report] to wiretap US citizens. CNET News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|