 |
|

Legal news from Monday, April 17, 2006 |
 |
|


Supreme Court hears arguments in employer retaliation case
Krista-Ann Staley on April 17, 2006 4:44 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday heard oral arguments in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad v. White [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], a case in which it will decide which of the three tests adopted by US courts of appeal should determine employer liability for a retaliation claim under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act [text; EEOC backgrounder]. Specifically, the Court will decide between the Sixth Circuit's test, applied in the present case [6th Circ. ruling, PDF], under which any "materially adverse change in the terms of employment" subsequent to a discrimination complaint establishes liability, the Ninth Circuit's test that adverse treatment "reasonably likely to deter" the employee from participating in a protected activity establishes liability, or the test from the Fifth and Eight Circuits prohibiting only an "ultimate employment decision."
After filing a sexual harassment complaint against her foreman Sheila White, a forklift operator at Burlington Northern [corporate website] was suspended for 37 days without pay for insubordination; an investigation later resulted in a reversal of the suspension and reinstatement of back pay. Following the reversal, White filed a harassment and retaliation claim with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [official website], and a jury awarded her $43,000 for the retaliation claim. During oral arguments the more conservative members of the bench, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito [Oyez profiles], expressed concern over the appropriate gauge for employer action, with Scalia worrying aloud whether an employer's refusal to say "good morning" could result in litigation. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg [Oyez profile], however, stated that White's suffering expanded beyond her temporary suspension to include financial and emotional strain on her family. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China could still try NYT researcher, lawyer says
Christopher G. Anderson on April 17, 2006 4:15 PM ET

[JURIST] After serving 19 months in a Chinese prison on charges of disclosing military secrets and being told the charges would be dropped [JURIST report] last month, New York Times researcher Zhao Yan [HRIC profile, PDF] learned Monday that he may still be tried for his work on an article that appeared in the Times. Chinese prosecutors told lawyers for Zhao that the although the charges have technically been dropped, the government plans to "revive" the case. Zhao's lawyers speculated that because "reviving" a case after it has been dropped is without legal precedent in China, the decision to hold him to trial likely came from the highest levels of the Communist Party, outside the framework of the ordinary legal system.
Zhao was arrested after a Sept. 7, 2004 article in the Times suggested that former Chinese President Jiang Zemin [Wikipedia profile] would resign from his position as head of the military. Within ten days after the article was published, Jiang did step down, and Zhao was sent to a Beijing prison. The case is an issue expected to be raised by US officials when current Chinese President Hu Jintao [official profile] visits Washington on Tuesday. Hu has previously insisted that Zhao was being held legally [JURIST report]. Reuters has more. The New York Times has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court reverses 9th Circuit asylum decision, agrees to hear three cases
Chris Buell on April 17, 2006 2:09 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday issued a summary opinion [PDF text] in Gonzales v. Thomas, 05-552, holding that the 9th Circuit had prematurely decided the asylum claims of a South African family. The 9th Circuit granted asylum [PDF opinion] to Michelle and David Thomas and their children based on claims that they were threatened due to their racist father-in-law's actions. In a per curiam opinion, the Court ruled that the appeals court should have sent the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals to determine whether family could constitute "membership in a particular social group" sufficient to qualify for asylum under the Immigration and Nationality Act [text]. Reuters has more.
Also Monday, the Court also issued an order list [PDF text] in which it granted certiorari in three cases. In Carey v. Musladin, 05-785, the Court will consider whether the 9th Circuit properly overturned [PDF opinion] a murder conviction and life sentence of a man because the victim's family members wore buttons with a picture of the victim in the courtroom throughout the trial. AP has more. The Court also granted certiorari in US v. Resendiz-Ponce, 05-998, in which the Court will consider whether leaving an element of a crime out an indictment can be harmless error, and BP American Production Co. v. Watson, 05-669, in which the Court will decide whether a six-year statute of limitations on lawsuits to recover money applies to agency enforcement actions. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer are both recused from the latter case. SCOTUSBlog has more.
The Court denied certiorari in Schneider v. Kissinger, 05-743, in which family members of deceased Chilean General Rene Schneider sued former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger [BBC profile], arguing that the US backed a plot to kill Schneider in 1970. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ Japan concerned Chinese ship ban violates international law
D. Wes Rist on April 17, 2006 12:25 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Monday's international brief, Japan [JURIST news archive] has raised concerns that a navigation ban on commercial ships in part of the East China Sea may actually violate Japan's sovereignty and international law under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea [text]. China's navigation ban covers part of Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone [Wikipedia backgrounder], a demarcation that China doesn't recognize. The ban is intended to allow Chinese workers to lay pipes for accessing natural gas reserves beneath the ocean floor. Japan has alleged that the ban is a violation of its territorial sovereignty and argues that the existence of the EEZ is recognized by international law. The Japanese Embassy in China has stated that it is seeking clarification of the exact location of the navigation ban and Japanese politicians have announced their intent to lodge a formal complaint if the report is confirmed. The Japan Times has local coverage. BBC News has more.
In other international legal news... - The African Union [official website] opened a Committee of Inquiry [press release, PDF] on Sunday to investigate allegations that AU troops were committing sexual assault and rape against residents of the Darfur region [JURIST news archive] in Sudan, where the AU is currently leading an ongoing peacekeeping mission. The committee is chaired by a leading women's rights expert and includes experts in human rights and women's rights from the UN, the EU, and other civil and human rights organizations. The AU Special Representative to Sudan Baba Gana Kingibe said that the committee would have full investigative powers and would also be involved in making recommendations for sanctions to be imposed against any individuals convicted of a crime. The Sudan Tribune has local coverage.
- Nearly two dozen journalists in Nepal [government website] were given 90 detention orders on Monday after they protested the Nepalese government's treatment of journalists engaged in pro-democracy protests over the weekend. The continued pro-democracy protests [JURIST news archive] in Nepal have resulted in the government using detention orders to remove civic leaders and protest officials from the public and keep them away from other demonstrators. The newspapers and television stations of the detained journalists have called on Nepalese citizens to continue protesting King Gyanendra [official profile, BBC profile and have called on Gyanendra to abdicate the throne. NepalNews.com has local coverage.
- A lawyer for former Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky [JURIST news archive] has said that no criminal charges will be sought [press release] against a cellmate that attacked Khodorkovsky [JURIST report] over the weekend, causing him to received stitches for a wound to his face. The cellmate is currently in solitary confinement while the prison conducts an investigation. Supporters of Khodorkovsky have alleged that the Russian government is behind repeated instances of difficulty in prison for the former oil tycoon, now serving a sentence for tax evasion. Khodorkovsky maintains his innocence and has alleged that Russian President Vladimir Putin [official profile] has intentionally framed him due to his outspoken political ideals. MosNews.com has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Israel police detain top Hamas MP for allegedly planning illegal rally
Lisl Brunner on April 17, 2006 10:22 AM ET

[JURIST] Israeli police arrested seven Hamas members of the Palestinian Legislative Council [official website] in Jerusalem on Sunday, including top MP Mohammed Abu Teir. Jerusalem police claimed that the men were violating a decree banning a political rally in the city. The men were briefly interrogated and released without charges. Teir, who was the number two candidate on the Hamas ballot in the January elections [JURIST report], had complained publicly earlier this month when Khaled Abu Arafa, the minister of Jerusalem affairs, was also detained by police [JURIST report] and released without charges. Arafa was supposedly attempting to open an office in east Jerusalem, which is prohibited under current peace accords until a permanent settlement is reached. In response to Teir's arrest, Arafa told the press that the rally was neither a political event nor one that is connected with Hamas, but instead a celebration of the birth of Mohammed. Last month, Israeli officials announced that they would contemplate assassinating top Hamas leaders [JURIST report] if the group resumed attacks in Israel. Hamas [MIPT backgrounder] is still considered a terrorist organization by much of the international community.
The arrests came a day before a Palestinian suicide bomber detonated a bomb in Tel Aviv [AP report], leaving eight other people dead and at least 49 wounded; Islamic Jihad [MIPT backgrounder] has claimed responsibility for the attack. A spokesman for the Palestinian Interior Ministry on Monday called the attack "a direct result of policy of the occupation and the brutal aggression and siege committed against our people." YNet news has local coverage. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Nepal police fire on pro-democracy protesters, killing one
Jeannie Shawl on April 17, 2006 8:28 AM ET

[JURIST] Nepal security forces on Monday fired on a group of pro-democracy protesters [JURIST news archive] in Nijgadh, killing at least one person and wounding five, marking the fifth incident where police have fired upon protesters [JURIST report] since widespread demonstrations against the rule of King Gyanendra [official website; BBC profile] began over a week ago. Gyanendra seized power [JURIST report] in a bloodless coup last year and dismissed the elected government, but last week promised to hold elections [JURIST report] by April 2007. This has done little to quell the protests as Gyanendra has made similar promises before, and over eight thousand people gathered in Kathmandu [JURIST report] over the weekend, calling for Gyanendra to step down immediately. AP has more. eKantipur.com has local coverage.
Shrish Shamshere Rana, head of Nepal's Ministry of Information and Communications [official website], meanwhile, said Monday that the government could respond to the protests by declaring a state of emergency and further suspending civil rights. The government has already banned protests in much of the capital city of Kathmandu and imposed curfews. Rana said that the government does not consider the strikes to be a pro-democracy movement, but rather an effort by Maoist rebels [BBC backgrounder] "to capture government." AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|