 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, April 13, 2006 |
 |
|


Iran nuclear program breaks no law, British MP insists as furor intensifies
Joshua Pantesco on April 13, 2006 4:23 PM ET

[JURIST] Iran [JURIST news archive] is permitted to develop a civil nuclear program and its resumption of uranium processing does not violate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), a leading British lawmaker said Thursday. Labor Party MP Jeremy Corbyn [official website], vice-chairman of the parliamentary Human Rights group, said in a letter [text] to the Guardian newspaper that Iran's decision to halt production had been a voluntary precaution taken while Iran negotiated with the UN to add favorable protocols to the NPT before they were brought before the UN Security Council, and so it was free to resume production. Last month the Security Council adopted [JURIST report] a statement [press release] directing Iran to cease production, but it was nonbinding. On Tuesday, Iran announced [BBC report] that its scientists had successfully enriched uranium to make nuclear fuel.
Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [official website] and the US government continue to press Iran to end its nuclear program. During a press conference held during a 24-hour trip to Iran [IAEA press release], IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei called for Iran to cease uranium enrichment immediately, while Iran's nuclear spokesperson refused to back down [AP report]. The IAEA has until the end of the month to advise the Security Council as to whether Iran has only peaceful intentions behind their nuclear ambitions. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said [AP report] Thursday that the Security Council [official website] should consider adopting a resolution against Iran under Chapter 7 [text] of the UN charter, which permits a military response to maintain or restore international peace and security. Russia and China, who have veto power over Security Council resolutions, have thusfar opposed its application to Iran. From Iran, IRNA has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Moussaoui takes stand again to berate defense lawyers, recant execution wish
Joshua Pantesco on April 13, 2006 3:24 PM ET

[JURIST] Convicted 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui [BBC profile] took the witness stand for the second time [JURIST report] in his sentencing trial [JURIST news archive; case docket] Thursday and lambasted his court-appointed defense attorneys for failing to move the proceeding away from Alexandria, VA, only a few miles away from the Pentagon building that was hit on 9/11. Virginia juries are thought to be more likely to administer the death penalty, and Moussaoui's jury last week found that the so-called "20th hijacker" is eligible for the death sentence [JURIST report]. This is not the first time the issue of venue has been raised: in April 2002 Moussaoui's initial bid to move the trial [CNN report] away from Virginia was denied [PDF order] by presiding judge Leonie Brinkema, who said Moussaoui would receive a fair trial there, despite the high concentration of government workers in Arlington and the media attention given to the Pentagon terrorist strike.
In other testimony Thursday, Moussaoui expressed no regret [Washington Post report] about the 9/11 attacks, but said that he no longer wished execution for his actions, as he had determined that the death penalty was inconsistent with Islamic teaching [Reuters report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Nepal king calls for general elections, dialogue with opposition
Jeannie Shawl on April 13, 2006 2:58 PM ET

[JURIST] AP is reporting that Nepal's King Gyanendra [official website; BBC profile] has called for general elections and has promised dialogue with the opposition. Opposition political parties have been staging pro-democracy protests [JURIST news archive] for over a week, calling on Gyanendra to abdicate his throne and allow free national elections. In February 2005 Gyanendra seized control of the government and dismissed elected officials [JURIST report].
In a message to the nation [text], Gyanendra said:
Democracy demands restraint and consensus as all forms of extremism are incompatible with democracy. While facing the challenges confronting the nation, democracy also emphasises acceptance of the preeminence of the collective wisdom in charting a future course. Aware of our traditions and sensitivities, as well as the self-respect and self-confidence of the Nepalese people who have always remained independent throughout history, dialogue must form the basis for the resolution of all problems. We, therefore, call upon all political parties to join in a dialogue, which we have always advocated, to bear the responsibility of and contribute towards activating the multiparty democratic polity. We believe that there is no alternative to multiparty democracy in the 21st century and the verdict of the ballot alone is legitimate. It is our wish that in order to reenergize multiparty democracy, there should not be any delay in reactivating all representative bodies through elections. We are in favour of sustainable peace and the people's right to vote. Democratic norms and values demand a commitment that the goals set forth by the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal-1990 can be achieved only through constitutional means. It is, therefore, our desire that with the active participation of all political parties committed to peace and democracy, a meaningful exercise in multiparty democracy be initiated through an exemplary democratic exercise like the general elections. Earlier Thursday, Nepal police using rubber bullets fired on a group of lawyers [JURIST report] holding a peaceful protest in Kathmandu and arrested some 70, prompting a promise from the Nepal Bar Association [official website] to boycott legal cases in the courts. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour [official profile] has voiced concern [press release; JURIST report] over use of violence and arbitrary detention by police and security forces trying to end the protests. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraq women's rights better under Saddam: survey
David Shucosky on April 13, 2006 12:02 PM ET

[JURIST] Women in Iraq had better quality of life and received more respect for their rights under Saddam Hussein's regime than the current system, according to a survey conducted by the Baghdad-based Woman Freedom Organization [advocacy website]. According to the group, women's rights were guaranteed in the constitution under Saddam, and women held important government positions. Now, however, security concerns have forced many women to remain at home, and the Islamic law making up the foundations of the new constitution [JURIST news archive] has been applied so as to suppress women [advocacy op-ed], the group complains. Officials within the government disagree, claiming that women can more readily express their political views and now hold positions in government that had been denied them under Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive].
The survey also noted an increase in unemployment and poverty levels for women. The number of widows has gone up as well, compounding a problem that has existed since the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. IRIN has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ US, UK introduce Sudan sanctions list to Security Council
D. Wes Rist on April 13, 2006 9:43 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Thursday's international brief, the US and UK representatives to the UN Security Council [official website] introduced a list of four individuals in Sudan [government website] that they allege have taken active steps to frustrate the attempted peace process in the Darfur region [JURIST news archive]. The list includes a call for sanctions to be imposed against the individuals [Bolton briefing transcript], including the suspension of travel rights and the freezing of all assets. Under Security Council procedure, a call for sanctions of this kind may be objected to for up to 48 hours after submission, but because of the Easter holiday, the objection period has been extended to Monday. If no objections are lodged, the sanctions take effect immediately. Since financial sanctions are included, the names on the list will remain classified until a decision concerning the implementation of sanctions has been reached. Russia has responded to the list by saying that it wishes to study the names to ensure that imposing sanctions will not simply exacerbate the problems occurring between rebel forces and Sudanese government representatives. The Sudan Tribune has local coverage.
In other international legal news ... - The Australian government [official website] has announced plans to conduct all asylum hearings for refugees arriving by boat on island processing facilities. The decision is aimed at the large and increasing number of refugee seekers coming from Indonesia to Australia. The new procedure will treat every arrival to Australia by boat as if they had arrived at a UN refugee processing center. Under Australian law, physical presence inside the country's territory grants certain constitutional rights, including due process rights. The Australian government has used island processing facilities to hold asylum hearings for refugee seekers that need only adhere to minimum UN standards instead of Australian constitutional rights. The decision is part of an ongoing dispute [BBC report] between Indonesia and Australia over its decision to grant asylum to 42 asylum seekers from the disputed Papua province. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Australia [JURIST news archive]. The Sydney Morning Herald has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Italian judges check ballots in disputed national election
Bernard Hibbitts on April 13, 2006 9:43 AM ET

[JURIST] Judges in Italy Thursday began examining some 43,000 problematic ballots to see whether including them in official returns might change the result of a national parliamentary election [Wikipedia backgrounder] held April 9-10 that seems to have given former center-left prime minister Romano Prodi [campaign website, in Italian] a narrow victory over current conservative incumbent Silvio Berlusconi [official profile; JURIST news archive]. Official results [latest tabulations, in Italian] from Italy's Interior Ministry [official website] indicate that Prodi's winning margin - in the lower house of parliament, just 25,000 votes out of 38.1 million ballots cast - was the narrowest in modern Italian history. Berlusconi has already called for a recount and has suggested polling irregularities, although he has backed away from earlier statements alleging outright fraud [Reuters report]. Approximately 1 million ballots were rejected outright, and Berlusconi has demanded checks be carried out of some 60,000 polling stations nationwide. An editorial in the Milan daily Corriere della Sera Thursday raised the prospect of an "Italian-style Florida", hearkening back to the US recount ordeal in the aftermath of the 2000 Presidential election [JURIST archive]. Ironically, a law adopted early in Berlusconi's administration that allowed Italians overseas to vote from abroad may have helped to topple him; expatriate Italians now have 6 senators and 12 deputies, and turned out in significant numbers [AP report] in the US and elsewhere to exercise their franchise for the first time.
The results of the Italian vote must be certified by the country's highest court before becoming official. Parliament is scheduled to meet April 28 and has to select a new president by May 13, who in turn will have to call on either Prodi or Berlusconi to attempt to form a government. Outgoing president Carlo Azeglio Ciampi [official website] has declined in the circumstances to name Prodi to office in the waning days of his own term. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICTY rules Serb commander in Dubrovnik siege unfit to stand trial
Elizabeth Schultz on April 13, 2006 9:13 AM ET

[JURIST] Vladimir Kovacevic [ICTY case backgrounder], a Serbian commander charged with war crimes [second amended indictment] for his part in the 1991 attack [BBC report] on the Croatian city of Dubrovnik, has been declared unfit to stand trial because of mental illness by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia [official website, JURIST news archive]. After an initial appearance at which he was unable to enter a plea, a series of mental health evaluations were ordered that resulted in his June 2004 provisional release [decision, PDF] to Serbia to receive psychiatric treatment. In December 2005, the ICTY held a hearing to review Kovacevic's condition and on Wednesday published their decision [PDF text, press release] declaring Kovacevic unfit to enter a plea and stand trial. The case has been dismissed without prejudice and Kovacevic may face charges if his condition improves.
Kovacevic, nicknamed "Rambo" by his men, was arrested in October 2003 and charged with six counts of violating the rules of war including murder, attacks on civilians, and devastation not justified by military necessity. The exact nature of his illness is unclear because portions of the decision related to his diagnosis were redacted to protect his privacy. Former Yugoslav general Pavle Strugar was sentenced to eight years in prison [JURIST report] last year for his role in the Dubrovnik attack. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|