 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, April 1, 2006 |
 |
|


Saddam prosecutor to present evidence on campaign against Kurds
Jaime Jansen on April 1, 2006 3:50 PM ET

[JURIST] Documents showing Saddam Hussein's role in Iraq's 1987-1989 Anfal campaign [HRW backgrounder] against the Kurds are ready to be presented to the Iraqi High Criminal Court [official website; JURIST news archive], according to Jaafar Al Moussawi, the chief prosecutor in the Saddam Hussein trial [JURIST news archive], speaking to AFP Saturday. The Anfal campaign led to the deaths of more than 180,000 Kurds and the destruction of 4,500 villages, including the gassing of thousands of Kurds in Halabja [US State Dept. backgrounder] in 1988. Saddam is currently on trial for the 1982 massacre of 148 Shiite villagers in Dujail [JURIST report], and will later go on trial for the Anfal killings, if he is not convicted and hung in the Dujail trial first. The Anfal documents, as well as new Dujail documents, must undergo authentication by experts before they can be presented to the Court because Saddam and his co-defendants earlier questioned the authenticity of documents entered against them in the Dujail trial.
Saddams defense team recently added a female Saudi lawyer [JURIST report] - the second female on the defense team. His trial on the Dujail charge has been adjourned until April 5 [JURIST report]. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

France protest leaders reject Chirac compromise on CPE youth labor law
Jaime Jansen on April 1, 2006 3:27 PM ET

[JURIST] French union and student leaders Saturday rejected as "unacceptable" a compromise offered by President Jacques Chirac [official profile] on the First Employment Contract (CPE) [text, in French; official backgrounder, in English; JURIST news archive], insisting they would continue public protests. Chirac announced [JURIST report] in a televised address [TF1 recorded video] Friday that he intends to sign the legislation. As drafted, it allows employers to fire workers under the age of 26 without cause in the first two years of their employment. Chiracs proposed compromise cuts the time period to one year, and requires employers to give a reason for dismissal. Chirac said he would not allow any CPE contracts to be concluded under the new law until the changes were made. France's Constitutional Council [official website] on Thursday ruled [decision, in French; case materials, in French] that the law does not violate the country's constitution [JURIST report].
The CPE has sparked a wave of protests [JURIST report] by students and union workers across France in the past few weeks; on Tuesday, well over a million people demonstrated against it. Protesters fear that the CPE will increase unemployment and destroy job security among young workers, although the law is actually intended to curb unemployment, which in France is running at a rate of 10 percent, 22 percent for workers under 25. While France has some of the best job security in Europe, it has the highest unemployment rate as well. VOA has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rice defends Guantanamo detentions at end of UK visit
Jaime Jansen on April 1, 2006 2:58 PM ET

[JURIST] US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice [official profile] defended the US detention facility at Guantanamo Bay in a news conference [transcript] Saturday with British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw [official profile] at the end of a UK visit. In response to questions on when Guantanamo might be closed, she insisted that: the United States doesn't desire to keep Guantanamo in being any longer than it's needed because we don't want to be the world's jailer. That's not the United States because it's not U.S. policy.
But we have to recognize that Guantanamo is there for a reason. It's there because we captured people on battlefields, particularly in Afghanistan but sometimes, frankly, on the battlefields of our own democratic societies, who were either plotting or planning or actively engaged in terrorist activities. And we have released hundreds of people from Guantanamo. It is not as if everybody who was in Guantanamo on October 1st, 2001 or January 1st, 2002 is still in Guantanamo. We have gone out of our way to try to release people. We've released British citizens back to Great Britain. We've done that with many different countries.
But there are some people who cannot either be safely be released to their countries or certainly safely released, and there are people for whom the value of the information that they have is still relevant to the fight against terror.
But I would just ask: What would be the alternative? If the alternative is to release people onto the streets so that they can do harm again, that we're not going to do. If the alternative is to try people, that we want to do. And we are looking for the means to do that, including the fact that the fate of military commissions is being reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, and so I'll say nothing more about that since it's a court case.
But I want to assure you, the reasons for Guantanamo have to do with the necessities of keeping very dangerous people off the streets. AP has more.
In February, the United Nations called for the US to close Guantanamo [JURIST report] in a 54-page report [PDF text; press release], and groups around the world have continued to call for the detention centers closure, including the European Parliament and Amnesty International. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan endorsed the UN report [JURIST report], stating that one cannot detain individuals in perpetuity and [] charges have to be brought against them and be given a chance to explain themselves, and be prosecuted, charged or released. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has not gone quite as far, simply saying that Guantanamo is an anomoly which hopes will be closed [JURIST report] after an appropriate "judicial process."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

AG Gonzales commits $15M to fight against urban gangs
Greg Sampson on April 1, 2006 11:06 AM ET

[JURIST] In a speech in Los Angeles on Friday, US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced [speech text] that the US Department of Justice, through its anti-gang initiative, will give out $15 million in grants to six areas to help fund their fight against gang violence. The eligible areas are Los Angeles, California; Tampa, Florida; Cleveland, Ohio; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas; and a region known as the 222 Corridor in southern Pennsylvania. The grant money will be portioned out over a three year period. AP has more.
Friday's announcement ties in with the Justice Department's broader effort to combat gang-related problems in communities throughout the US, which it announced in February [official press release]. According to the National Crime Victimization Survey [summary], gang members commit almost 6 percent [Bureau of Justice Statistics report] of the 6.6 million violent victimizations each year. Over 70 percent of states have enacted some form of legislation [National Youth Gang Center summary; database of gang-related legislation] to curb gang-related violence; the legislation generally enhances penalties for crimes such as drive-by shootings, graffiti, gang activity and forfeiture, and gang member recruitment.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|