 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, March 28, 2006 |
 |
|


Defense lawyers use al Qaeda statements to rebut Moussaoui 9/11 testimony
Joshua Pantesco on March 28, 2006 7:11 PM ET

[JURIST] Court-appointed lawyers for Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive] rested the case of their headstrong and sometimes fractious client in federal court Tuesday by reading recorded statements from five al Qaeda leaders to show that contrary to Moussaoui's own testimony [JURIST report], he was not in fact slated to participate in the Sept. 11 attacks [JURIST news archive]. Instead, the attorneys sought to portray Moussaoui as a "loose cannon" not permitted by his superiors to be a 9/11 hijacker, with one al-Qaeda operative testifying that Moussaoui broke security rules, disagreed with internal plans, and suggested fantastic fundraising schemes, including kidnapping Chinese businessmen for ransom. Bin Laden aide Sayf al-Adl said that Moussaoui was "a confirmed jihadist but was absolutely not going to take part in the Sept. 11, 2001, mission," a statement confirmed by several other witnesses.
As Moussaoui has already pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to 6 terrorist conspiracy charges [indictment], the sentencing trial currently underway will only decide whether he receives life in prison or the death penalty. To achieve the death penalty, prosecutors must show that if Moussaoui had revealed information to the FBI at the time of his arrest in August of 2001, the 9/11 attacks may have been prevented. Defense lawyers have argued that the administration already had ample information suggesting the possibility of such an attack, and on Tuesday, one defense lawyer read excerpts from the 9/11 commission report [text] that mentioned 12 security reports filed from 1994 to 2001 "suggesting that terrorists might use airplanes as weapons." Closing arguments in the sentencing trial are scheduled for Wednesday afternoon. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Congressman loses taped phone call leak appeal
Andrew Wood on March 28, 2006 3:37 PM ET

[JURIST] A three-judge panel of the US DC Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] ruled [opinion pdf text] Tuesday that Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) [official profile] violated s. 2511 of US Code Title 18 [text] by disclosing an illegally obtained tape to reporters in 1996. The majority found that McDermott violated the rights of Representative John Boehner (R-OH) [official profile] who was heard on the taped phone call involving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and ordered McDermott to pay Boehner over $700,000 in damages and legal costs. The tape was recorded over a police scanner by a couple in Florida. The court said, "Because there was no genuine dispute that Representative McDermott knew the Martins had illegally intercepted the conversation, he did not lawfully obtain the tape from them."
In dissent, Judge David Sentelle said McDermott had a first Amendment right to disclose the tape, a view expressed by McDermott's lawyer who said that a ruling against McDermott would significantly affect reporters and newsmakers. Eighteen news organizations had echoed this concern by filing a brief supporting McDermott. McDermott has released a statement on the appeals court ruling, invoking the dissent and insisting that The American people have a right to know when their government's leaders are plotting to deceive them, and that is exactly what was happening during a telephone call in 1996 involving Republican House leaders, including then Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and Rep. John Boehner. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Environmental brief ~ Federal judge rules in favor of fish over farmers
Tom Henry on March 28, 2006 3:30 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Tuesday's environmental law news, Judge Saundra Armstrong of the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] has ruled that the US Bureau of Reclamation [official website] must leave more water in the Klamath River basin to ensure survival of the threatened Coho salmon [ESA listing status]. The river runs from northern California to the Oregon coast and has been the source of controversy between farmers that want water for irrigation and those that want to protect the salmon. Last October, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] remanded the case [JURIST report] to Judge Armstrong to allocate more water for the salmon. The Los Angeles Times has more.
In other environmental law news... - The UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [official website] announced [press release] the new Climate Change Programme [PDF text] Tuesday. The plan [backgrounder] includes both the measures and policies currently in place to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and the priorities for future regulations. The London Evening Standard has more.
- The Brazil Ministry of the Environment [official website, in Portuguese] announced late Sunday night that a large section of the Amazon rainforest will be declared a protected zone over the next three years. Approximately 84,000 square miles is slated for the designation. AP has more.
- The Seattle Washington city council [official website] enacted [press release] new rules Monday to help restore urban streams and wetlands. The ordinance [text], which could go into effect as early as May 9, includes such measures as restricting pesticide use, requiring tree and plant replacement within 100 feet of lake and marine shorelines, and the "daylighting" of certain streams in the city. Daylighting is the practice of exposing streams that had been previously buried in underground pipes. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guantanamo Algerians complained to visiting delegation about treatment: report
Holly Manges Jones on March 28, 2006 1:39 PM ET

[JURIST] A delegation of Algerian officials made the country's first visit to the US military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] in mid-March to evaluate the conditions of 26 Algerian citizens being held there, according to a report [text, in French] published Tuesday in Algeria's El Watan [media website, in French] newspaper. Representatives of the Algerian ministries of defense, foreign affairs and justice made up the group; they were allowed to speak with the detainees in private, and one of the visiting officials told the newspaper the detainees had complained of inhumane treatment. The report states that US figures show 29 or 30 Algerians being held at Guantanamo, suggesting that the delegation may not have been able to contact all the detainees it sought. The 26 were all recruited in the 1990s and spent time in London before fanning out to Bosnia, Chechnya, Afghanistan and Pakistan, the countries where they were ultimately captured.
Algeria [JURIST news archive] is currently negotiating with the US to repatriate the 26 prisoners to their home country, but discussions are expected to take some time. Military-to-military exchanges between the two countries began last year and US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said in February that he hopes to increase counter-terrorism cooperation with the Algerian government. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Judge dismisses 4 counts against former Enron executives
Holly Manges Jones on March 28, 2006 1:02 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal judge Tuesday dismissed three counts against former Enron [corporate website; JURIST news archive] CEO Jeffrey Skilling [Houston Chronicle profile] and one count against company founder Kenneth Lay [Houston Chronicle profile], shortly after the prosecution rested in the fraud and conspiracy case [indictment, PDF; DOJ Enron trial materials] against the pair. According to Skilling's attorney, US District Judge Sim Lake dismissed one count of wire fraud and two counts of securities fraud against Skilling, giving him 28 remaining counts, and also dropped one securities fraud count against Lay, leaving him with six counts. The dismissed charges involve crimes that allegedly occurred in the first quarter of 2000, for which prosecutors did not present evidence. AP has more.
Prosecutors Tuesday ended nearly nine weeks of testimony including that of 13 former executives, some of whom have already pleaded guilty or settled the charges against them. The government used tapes of conference calls with Wall Street analysts, videos of employee meetings, and testimony by witnesses to argue that Skilling and Lay continually lied about the financial stability of the fallen company. The defense is scheduled to begin its case on Monday and both Skilling and Lay, who have denied any wrongdoing, are expected to testify. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

French labor law prompts nationwide strikes, huge demonstrations
Chris Buell on March 28, 2006 12:33 PM ET

[JURIST] Transit workers, postal staff, teachers and media employees went on strike and more than a million people demonstrated across France [JURIST news archive] Tuesday as part of escalating protests against the First Employment Contract (CPE) [FAQ, in French; official backgrounder, in English; JURIST news archive], a contentious labor law passed by the French parliament earlier this month that allows employers to fire workers under 26 years old without cause during the first two years of employment. The French Interior Ministry said more than 1,000,000 people marched to show their opposition to the law, while unions organizing the protests claimed as many as 3,000,000 people demonstrated. In Paris, police scuffled with demonstrators at the end of a rally there, leading to more than a hundred arrests.
The First Employment Contract has triggered a string of protests by many who fear the law will increase unemployment among younger workers. Many have called for Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin [official profile, in English] to cancel the legislation before it takes effect at the beginning of April. Talks between de Villepin and union leaders broke down [JURIST report] over the weekend. Supporters have argued the law will give employers more control under France's traditionally tight job security laws. The Guardian has more. Le Monde has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Moussaoui testimony conflicts with statements from 9/11 mastermind
Holly Manges Jones on March 28, 2006 7:50 AM ET

[JURIST] Jurors in the Zacarias Moussaoui [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] sentencing trial were left in a quandary Monday after hearing conflicting testimony from Moussaoui and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed [Wikipedia profile], the alleged mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks [JURIST news archive]. Taking the stand in his own defense, Moussaoui said he was part of the Sept. 11 plot and planned to fly a fifth plane into the White House [JURIST report] along with "shoe bomber" Richard Reid [BBC profile]. Subsequently, however, the jury was read written statements by Mohammed, currently in US custody, indicating that the plan was for Moussaoui to participate in a second round of attacks on the US unrelated to Sept. 11.
Moussaoui's testimony came as a surprise since he has previously denied any involvement in the Sept. 11 plot, and his attorneys have suggested that he is seeking the death penalty to achieve "martyrdom." The jury is expected to hear statements Tuesday from another al-Qaida member, Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi [Wikipedia profile], suspected of providing money to the terrorist group. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|