 |
|

Legal news from Friday, March 17, 2006 |
 |
|


Appeals court rules EPA cannot exempt old power plants from new pollution controls
Bernard Hibbitts on March 17, 2006 7:53 PM ET

[JURIST] The US DC Circuit Court of Appeals held [PDF decision] Friday that the Environmental Protection Agency [official website] cannot exempt coal-fired power plants, oil refineries and other industrial facilities from a requirement to install new pollution controls to keep up with emissions changes. A rule creating an exemption under the so-called New Source Review [official website] permitting program was adopted by the Bush administration in 2003 at the instance of energy companies seeking to lessen litigation costs and settlements was challenged by a coalition of 15 states and several environmental groups that argued they were contrary to the provisions of the Clean Air Act [EPA backgrounder]. Operation of the rule was stayed by court order in December 2003 pending the resolution of appeals. In its decision Friday the appeals court said that "EPAs interpretation [of the law] would produce a strange, if not an indeterminate, result: a law intended to limit increases in air pollution would allow sources operating below applicable emission limits to increase significantly the pollution they emit without government review."
The ruling affects some 800 power plants nationwide and more than 17,000 other facilities, including significant numbers in New York and California, the two most populous US states. In a statement on Friday's ruling, New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer called it a "major victory for clean air and public health" that would "encourage industry to build new and cleaner facilities, instead of prolonging the life of old dirty plants." Spitzer noted that "more than 20,000 Americans die prematurely each year from power plant pollution". The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

France government condemns violent protests against youth labor law
James M Yoch Jr on March 17, 2006 1:49 PM ET

[JURIST] The French government on Friday condemned violent protests against the recently passed First Employment Contract (CPE) [FAQ, in French] labor law. A group of student and union demonstrators clashed with French authorities around the Sorbonne University in Paris Thursday, where 187 protesters were detained for setting minor fires, overturning cars in the street, and throwing objects at police, who used tear gas, rubber pellets and water cannons to stymie the crowds. Arrests across the country numbered close to 300 for Thursday's protests [JURIST report], although the violence died down by evening. A spokesperson reaffirmed the government's support [Reuters report] of the CPE Friday.
French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin [official website] proposed the controversial CPE, which allows French employers to hire workers under the age of 26 for a conditional two-year period during which they can be fired without cause, to provide jobs for young workers who suffer from staggering unemployment rates. However, critics of the law, including students, union members and left-wing politicos, contend that the law erodes job stability and threatens France's traditionally strong workers' rights. Many believe that increasing voter disapproval of the CPE and Villepin's firm stance [JURIST report] on the law sets a substantial obstacle to Villepin's anticipated candidacy for president. AP has more. Le Monde has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court OKs Tennessee pro-life-only license plate plan
James M Yoch Jr on March 17, 2006 1:43 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [official website] on Friday ruled 2-1 in a three-judge panel decision [opinion, PDF] that Tennessee can offer a pro-life specialty license plate even though it does not offer a pro-choice license plate to state drivers. The lawsuit, filed [ACLU press release] by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee [official website] on behalf of Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee and three individuals, contends that the issuance of only pro-life plates signals government endorsement of that view, especially since a portion of the proceeds from the plates goes to an anti-abortion group, New Life Resources.
Writing for the panel, Circuit Judge John M. Rogers noted: Although this exercise of government one-sidedness with respect to a very contentious political issue may be ill-advised, we are unable to conclude that the Tennessee statute contravenes the First Amendment. Government can express public policy views by enlisting private volunteers to disseminate its message, and there is no principle under which the First Amendment can be read to prohibit government from doing so because the views are particularly controversial or politically divisive. Other courts around the country have ruled on the issuance of special license plates previously. In September 2005, a district judge ruled that Arizona could refuse to issue "choose life" plates [JURIST report]. In March 2004, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down anti-abortion plates [JURIST report] in South Carolina, while the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in April 2004 upheld similar plates [JURIST report] against a challenge in Louisiana. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Environmental brief ~ EPA rules against North Carolina in out-of-state pollution dispute
Tom Henry on March 17, 2006 11:51 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Friday's environmental law news, the US Environmental Protection Agency [official website] has ruled against a petition [PDF text] from the state of North Carolina to force the cleanup of coal-fired power plants in other states that North Carolina argued contribute to its air pollution problems. The petition was based on the "good neighbor" provision (Sec. 126) of the Clean Air Act [text]. The EPA denied the request [PDF text], saying that the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) [PDF text, EPA backgrounder] will "address the emission reductions requested by North Carolina. CAIR will eliminate any significant contribution of air pollutants from states linked to North Carolina's nonattainment thus satisfying North Carolina's petition request." AP has more.
In other environmental law news... - Hilmar Cheese [corporate website], the world's largest cheese factory, will pay $3 million for violating California water pollution laws. The factory, located outside of Modesto, California, has been operating since 1995 beyond its permits in the volume and salinity of its discharges. In the settlement [PDF text, press release, PDF], Hilmar will pay for a study of salinity management in process water in California's food processing industry, for a study to determine the extent of its pollution, and for soil and groundwater cleanup. The Sacramento Bee has more.
- The South Korea Supreme Court [official website] refused to hear an appeal Thursday of a ruling [Korea Times report] that will allow the government to complete a 20-mile long seawall project. The Saemangum project will block two river estuaries and turn wetlands into agricultural land. Critics argue that the project will destroy important wetlands for shore birds and waterfowl, erase a rich fishery and aquaculture resource and is not economically required due to available inland farmland that has been vacated by a declining rural population. AFP has more.
- Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, Jr. [official website] signed into law a bill [text] Thursday that will ban smoking in private clubs and restaurants. The ban on smoking in private fraternal organizations, country clubs and restaurants begins Jan 1, 2007, and becomes effective for remaining private clubs and taverns on Jan. 1, 2009. Critics of the bill say Utah should follow the direction of other states in allowing an exemption for smoking in private clubs. Utah is unique among the states, however, in requiring liquor to be sold by itself only in private clubs [backgrounder], resulting in many seemingly public "private clubs." Some Utah legislators, and the governor, support proposed legislation that would end the private establishment rule for liquor sales, which could open up the possibility of a smoking exemption for actual private clubs. Only the Salt Lake City International Airport remains exempt from both the liquor and smoking bans. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICTY: 'no indications' Milosevic poisoned
Bernard Hibbitts on March 17, 2006 8:13 AM ET

[JURIST] Judge Fausto Pocar, president of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [official website], released updated results Friday from the autopsy [JURIST report] on Slobodan Milosevic [JURIST news archive] indicating that toxicological tests undertaken by Dutch investigators showed "no indications" of poisoning, contrary to a claim allegedly made by the indicted ex-Yugoslav president before his sudden death Saturday. While stressing that the results were still provisional and that the examination would continue next week, the Hague District Public Prosecutor's Office said [letter] that in particular it had found no traces of rifampicine, a drug used to treat TB that could have counteracted Milosevic's heart medications. The office noted, however, that the drug does not persist long in the body; earlier this week a Dutch toxicologist said that blood tests he performed on Milosevic several weeks ago while he was still alive showed the presence of the drug [JURIST report].
Pocar also announced Friday that in the face of what he called "media speculation with regard to the running of the UN Detention Unit" where Milosevic was housed, he was ordering another audit of the facility, although he expressed "full confidence" in its staff, noting that previous independent inspections had shown that "conditions in the Detention Unit are of the very highest standard."
Reiterating the Tribinal's regret that Milosevic could not be brought to judgment, Pocar insisted that the Tribunal still had significant work to do: We recognize that this case was an important one. However, it is not the only important case that the Tribunals judges have before them. We continue to try the highest-level persons accused of perpetrating the most serious crimes against Serb, Croat, Bosnian Muslim, Albanian and other victims in the former Yugoslavia. In closing, I would like to emphasize that the Tribunal remains absolutely committed to fulfilling its critical mandate to render justice in these cases as fairly and expeditiously as possible. Read the full text of Pocar's statement. Milosevic is scheduled for burial in his home town of Pozarevac, in eastern Serbia, on Saturday.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|