 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, March 15, 2006 |
 |
|


Denmark prosecutor rejects charging newspaper for Muhammad cartoons
Krystal MacIntyre on March 15, 2006 5:10 PM ET

[JURIST] Denmark's Director of Public Prosecutions [official website, in English] Henning Fode has decided not to press criminal charges against Jyllands-Posten [media website], the Danish newspaper that first published caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad [JURIST news archive] which last month set off worldwide protests amongst Muslims leading to multiple deaths, the burning of Danish embassy buildings, and boycotts of Danish goods. The top prosecutor upheld the earlier decision of a regional prosecutor who maintained the drawings were protected by freedom of speech laws and did not violate bans on racist and blasphemous speech. In a press release [PDF] on the full ruling [English version], Fode said: I have today decided not to institute criminal proceedings in the case of Jyllands-Posten's article "The Face of Muhammed", which was published on 30 September 2005 and where complaints were filed against Jyllands-Posten for violation of Sections 140 and 266 b of the Danish Criminal Code. My decision is that there is no violation of the said rules of the Danish Criminal Code.
Although there is no basis for instituting criminal proceedings in this case, it should be noted that both provisions of the Danish Criminal Code contain a restriction of the freedom of expression. Section 140 of the Criminal Code protects religious feelings against mockery and scorn and Section 266 b protects groups of persons against scorn and degradation on account of their religion among other things. To the extent publicly made expressions fall within the scope of these rules there is, therefore, no free and unrestricted right to express opinions about religious subjects. It is thus not a correct description of existing law when the article in Jyllands-Posten states that it is incompatible with the right to freedom of expression to demand special consideration for religious feelings and one has to be ready to put up with scorn, mockery and ridicule. My decision in the matter cannot be appealed to a higher administrative authority. This follows from Section 99(3) of the Danish Administration of Justice Act. Many Muslim organizations and individuals have expressed their disapproval of the decision, including the Islamic Faith Community, which says it will consider taking the issue to the European Court of Human Rights [official website] in Strasbourg, France. The Danish Foreign Ministry has meanwhile upgraded travel warnings for Muslim countries, fearing that the decision may cause negative reactions towards Danes abroad. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

FCC proposes record $3.6M fine against CBS for indecency violations
Jeannie Shawl on March 15, 2006 4:00 PM ET

[JURIST] The Federal Communications Commission [official website] on Wednesday proposed a record $3.6 million fine against CBS, its stations and affiliates for violating decency standards [FCC materials] by airing a graphic sex scene in the program "Without a Trace." The recommendation [FCC notice, PDF] comes as the FCC resolved over 300,000 complaints [press release, PDF] about close to 50 television programs on multiple networks aired between February 2002 and March 2005. Under the FCC proposal, dozens of stations and affiliates will be fined $32,500, the current maximum fine per indecency violation. The record fines were part of the first round of fines to be issued under current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin [official profile], who in the past has supported raising the maximum fine for indecency violations [JURIST news archive].
Also Wednesday, the FCC upheld its previously-proposed $550,000 fine against 20 CBS stations [JURIST report] for what it called the "broadcast of indecent material during the February 1, 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show": The Commission rejects CBS' claim that the pulling off a portion of Janet Jackson's bustier to reveal her breast is not indecent. The Commission also holds that CBS consciously and willfully failed to take actions to prevent the broadcast of the material, and that CBS is responsible for the halftime show. Read the full FCC press release [PDF] and forfeiture order [PDF]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

NY AG Spitzer sues tax preparation giant for fraudulent retirement account plans
Krystal MacIntyre on March 15, 2006 1:24 PM ET

[JURIST] New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer [official website] Wednesday launched a $250 million lawsuit [complaint, PDF] against H&R Block [corporate website], the largest tax preparation service in the US, for fraudulently coaxing its customers into a retirement account plan that lost them money. Spitzer said that money in the retirement accounts decreased over time because the low interest rate did not cover the fees associated with the account. The state began its probe of H&R Block in 2005 after being tipped off by an H&R block tax preparer. Spitzer claims that H&R Block opened more than 500,000 Express IRA [product backgrounder] accounts in the past four years, and 85% of customers who opened the accounts paid H&R Block more in fees than they earned in interest on their accounts. The lawsuit calls for H&R block to stop engaging in fraudulent practices, disgorge profits, and to pay damages, restitution, and civil penalties of no less than $250 million. Read Spitzer's press release on the suit; recorded audio [MP3] of part of his announcement is also available.
H&R Block Chairman and CEO Mark A. Ernst [official profile] defended [press release] the Express IRA product Wednesday, noting that "...of all the Express IRA accounts opened between 2001 and 2005, 78% have experienced positive net tax savings benefits and interest earnings." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK police arrest five over London Muhammad cartoons protest
Greg Sampson on March 15, 2006 12:45 PM ET

[JURIST] British police arrested five men on Wednesday for their suspected role in protests staged outside the Danish embassy in London on February 3 and 4 against the publication of Muhammad cartoons [JURIST news archive] that first appeared in a Danish newspaper in September 2005. The arrests follow weeks of investigation by a special law enforcement team set up by the London Metropolitan Police called Operation Laverda, which collected video, audio, photographs and other evidence of protestors. During the protests, demonstrators displayed placards threatening terrorist attacks like those on September 11th and July 7th, as well as the "massacre" of people who insult Islam.
The protests sparked substantial political response in Britain, including rebuke by the Muslim Council of Britain [official website], which called for the prosecution of the protesters, and a call [JURIST report] for the revival of a "glorifying terrorism" crime by UK Home Secretary Charles Clarke [official profile]. Police charged four of the suspects with incitement to murder, and held all five on charges of "using threatening words or written material to stir up racial hatred." On February 7, police arrested a protester [Local London report] who dressed as a suicide bomber at the demonstration. The Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ UN approves Human Rights Council over US opposition
Jeannie Shawl on March 15, 2006 12:16 PM ET

[JURIST] AP is reporting that the UN General Assembly [official website] has approved a resolution [JURIST document] creating a new Human Rights Council by a 170-4 vote, despite US opposition. The new rights body will replace the widely criticized Commission on Human Rights [official website].
General Assembly President Jan Eliasson's proposal [JURIST report] reflected months of negotiations between UN member countries, but the US quickly rejected the proposal [JURIST report] and had hoped to block passage of the resolution [NYT report] unless additional amendments were made. AP has more.
3:11 PM - Joining the US in voting against the resolution were Israel, the Marshall Islands and Palau. Venezuela, Iran and Belarus abstained. Calling the vote "historic," UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said the new Human Rights Council: gives the United Nations the chance a much-needed chance to make a new beginning in its work for human rights around the world. ... No country will be wholly satisfied with every paragraph in the resolution, but such is the nature of international negotiations. It preserves important strengths of the Commission on Human Rights, such as the system of special procedures and the participation of NGOs, while also setting forth important innovations to address the Commission's weaknesses. Taken as a whole, the resolution gives us a solid foundation, on which all who are truly committed to the cause of human rights must now build. I believe they will succeed in building a framework within which governments from all parts of the world can work together to promote human rights, more effectively than ever before. Read Annan's full statement. Election of the Council's 47 members is scheduled for May 9th, with the first meeting due to take place on June 19. The UN has a summary of Wednesday's General Assembly session. The UN News Centre has more.
4:47 PM ET - Explaining the US vote, US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton [official profile] said:The Secretary-General ... proposed that the Council elect its members by a two-thirds majority. This proposal is not included in the resolution before us today, and it should be. The higher hurdle for membership would have made it harder for countries that are not demonstrably committed to human rights to win seats on the Council. It would have helped to prevent the election of countries that only seek to undermine the new body from within.
The United States also proposed an exclusionary criteria to keep gross abusers of human rights off the Council. This proposal would have excluded Member States against which measures are in effect under Chapter VII of the UN Charter related to human rights abuses or acts of terrorism. We also expressed a willingness to consider alternatives to satisfy the need for a strong mechanism to exclude the worst human rights violators.
Sadly, these suggestions were not included in the new text. The resolution before us merely requires Member States to "take into account" a candidate's human rights record when voting. And the provision for the General Assembly to suspend an elected member of the Council requires a two-thirds vote, a standard higher than that for electing members.
Our position on the need for a strong, credible membership is one of principle...
We had a historic opportunity to create a primary human rights organ in the UN poised to help those most in need and offer a hand to governments to build what the Charter calls "fundamental freedoms." The Council that is created will be our legacy. We must not let the victims of human rights abuses throughout the world think that UN Member States were willing to settle for "good enough". We must not let history remember us as the architects of a Council that was a "compromise" and merely "the best we could do" rather than one that ensured doing "all we could do" to promote human rights.
Mr. President, absent stronger mechanisms for maintaining credible membership, the United States could not join consensus on this resolution. We did not have sufficient confidence in this text to be able to say that the HRC would be better than its predecessor. Read the full text of Bolton's statement in the General Assembly.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

FBI monitored anti-war activists, ACLU documents show
Greg Sampson on March 15, 2006 11:56 AM ET

[JURIST] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) [official website] monitored gatherings organized by the Thomas Merton Center for Peace and Justice [advocacy website], an anti-war activist organization based in Pittsburgh, according to documents [press release; ACLU backgrounder] released Tuesday by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website]. The ACLU contends that the FBI based its investigation solely on the organization's political views, particularly its opposition to the war in Iraq. An FBI spokesperson responded to the claims, stating that the agency was "acting with all appropriate investigative authorities." In addition to the documents released by the ACLU on Tuesday, an FBI report also indicates that agents photographed members of the Thomas Merton Center during a November 2002 gathering, during which members handed out leaflets opposing the war in Iraq. The documents came from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [DOJ backgrounder] requests filed by the ACLU in twenty states on behalf of over 150 organizations and individuals. The Washington Post has more.
On the heels of the ACLU's announcement, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) [advocacy website] on Tuesday announced [press release] that it filed a FOIA request [document, PDF] on behalf of itself and fourteen New York-based political and religious groups to determine whether the FBI is investigating them as well. The NYCLU also filed FOIA requests with the New York, Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse police departments. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam call on Iraqis to fight prompts court closure during testimony
Tom Henry on March 15, 2006 9:25 AM ET

[JURIST] Saddam Hussein formally testified in his own defense for the first time Wednesday at his trial [JURIST news archive] in Iraq, calling the Iraqi High Criminal Court a "comedy" before the hearing was closed to the public. Chief Judge Ra'uf Rasheed Abdel-Rahman [BBC profile] closed the courtroom after Hussein called on Iraqis to put an end to sectarian violence and focus their efforts on attacking American troops. In a heated exchange, Abdel-Rahman told Hussein he was not allowed to give political speeches in the court, but Hussein continued to read from his prepared speech even after his microphone was turned off. Abdel-Rahman eventually ordered the session closed to the public, cut the video feed, and ordered all journalists out of the courtroom.
Hussein and his co-defendants face charges of murder, torture, forced expulsions and illegal imprisonment stemming from the 1982 massacre in Dujail [JURIST report]. Prosecutors are trying to show that Hussein's forces sought to punish the town's civilian population through hundreds of arrests and detentions. Before Hussein began his defense, his half-brother and former intelligence chief Barzan Ibrahim denied any involvement [AP report] in the Dujail crackdown, saying that he did not order any detentions of the Shiite villagers. Ibrahim also said that he has been poorly treated while in US custody and that his requests for medical tests have been ignored. The trial has now been adjourned until April 5. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN wants Khmer Rouge genocide trial to start soon
Angela Onikepe on March 15, 2006 4:15 AM ET

[JURIST] UN officials from the Office of Administration of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal are urging the timely start of the genocide trial of aging Khmer Rouge [JURIST news archive] leaders, noting the weekend death of Slobodan Milosevic in the fifth year of his high-profile war crimes trial at The Hague. The communist Khmer Rouge were responsible for the deaths of approximately 1.7 million people by disease, forced labor, starvation, and execution during their 1975-1978 rule over Cambodia. Most of their former leaders are in their 70s, including Ieng Sary, the former foreign minister who was recently in the hospital for a heart condition [JURIST report], 'Brother Number Two' Nuon Chea, Deputy Prime Minister and Deputy Secretary of the Communist Party, and Ta Mok [Trial Watch Profile], the 78 year old military chief known as the Butcher. Duch [Trial Watch Profile], (real name, Kang Kek Ieu), the head of the Tuol Sleng interrogation and torture center, is younger at 59 years old. Both Ta Mok and Duch have been detained and charged with war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity.
Helen Jarvis, Chief of Public Affairs for the Extraordinary Chambers of Cambodia, emphasized that getting proceedings underway quickly was also important for "the victims and Cambodians who are waiting for justice". She made the comments at a ceremony to mark the signing of a logistical agreement on the operation of the Cambodian tribunal. Last week UN Secretary General Kofi Annan nominated 12 international legal experts [JURIST report] to serve with the court in various capacities. The Cambodian government is finalizing a similar list. The trial has been allocated a three-year budget of $56.3 million. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|