 |
|

Legal news from Monday, March 13, 2006 |
 |
|


Abu Ghraib dog handler faces court-martial
Alexandria Samuel on March 13, 2006 11:04 AM ET

[JURIST] A military court-martial is set to begin Monday for US Army dog handler Sgt. Michael J. Smith, facing 14 counts of misconduct for using unmuzzled dogs to abuse detainees at Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive] in 2003 and 2004. Military prosecutors contend that Smith was operating outside of protocol when he allowed the unmuzzled animals to bark at and bite detainees during interrogations. Attorneys for Smith are expected to argue that his actions were condoned by his commanders.
The use of dogs at Abu Ghraib prison was started in November 2003 on the recommendation of Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller [Wikipedia profile], then commanding Guantanamo. Miller has said that the dogs there were used to control detainees, but were not approved for use during interrogations. Colonel Thomas Pappas, then the top intelligence officer at the prison, has disputed this [Washington Post report], telling military investigators that Miller told him that dogs had been useful during interrogations, and that they were "effective in setting the atmosphere for which, you know, you could get information." Miller has invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and will not be testifying [JURIST report] at the Smith trial. If convicted, Smith faces 29 1/2 years in prison. The trial of fellow dog handler Sgt. Santos A. Cardona is scheduled to begin in May. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Moussaoui judge recesses trial as government misconduct puts death penalty on line
Bernard Hibbitts on March 13, 2006 10:20 AM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Leonie Brinkema stunned courtroom observers Monday by calling a recess in the September 11 hijacking trial of Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive] Monday after being informed that government lawyers had coached witnesses in the case. The government informed the court and defense over the weekend that a Transportion Security Administration attorney had improperly coached four government FAA witnesses contrary to a sequestration direction [PDF].
Brinkema told lawyers "This is the second significant error by the government affecting the constitutional rights of the defendant and the criminal justice system in this country in the context of a death case", and said she would now consider whether the breach warranted removing the death penalty from the government as a sentencing option. Late last week Brinkema warned prosecutors [JURIST report] against making any indication to jury members that Moussaoui was obligated to tell FBI agents about his terrorist connections after his arrest in August 2001, saying they were on "shaky legal ground". AP has more.
11:15 AM ET - The prosecution also informed Brinkema that the TSA lawyer had shown the witness the government's opening statement, contrary to a pre-trial order. Brinkema called the breaches "the most egregious violation of the court's rules on witnesses" she had seen "in all the years I've been on the bench." The Washington Post has more.
Brinkema has already thrown out the government's death penalty case against Moussaoui once [AP report; memorandum opinion, PDF], doing so in October 2003 after the government defied an order to give Moussaoui access to key witnesses against him. The ruling was reversed on appeal and the case remanded.
1:35 PM ET - The jury in the case has been sent home until Wednesday; Brinkema has scheduled a hearing Tuesday to access to what extent evidence may have been tainted by the witness coaching. AFP has more.
3:35 PM ET - A redacted version [PDF] of the US Attorney's March 13 letter to Judge Brinkema on possible breach of her witness sequestration order with copies of the relevant e-mails to witnesses from the TSA lawyer is now available.
7:50 PM ET - The defense memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss [PDF] the death notice based on the government's sequestration violation, and the government memorandum in opposition [PDF], are now both online. The government argues that despite the violation, "dismissal of the death notice is unwarranted and less draconian remedial measures are available to cure any possible taint to the witnesses." There was, the government noted, "no prosecutorial bad faith."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Indonesia high court rejects appeal by militia leader convicted for East Timor killings
Holly Manges Jones on March 13, 2006 9:24 AM ET

[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Indonesia has denied the appeal [Metro TV report, in Bahasa Indonesian] of pro-Indonesia militia leader Eurico Guterres [Wikipedia profile] for charges stemming from his involvement in massacres that occurred during the 1999 violence in East Timor [PBS backgrounder], according to Jakarta's Metro TV [media website] Monday. Guterres, who was free while his appeal was heard, will now be sent to prison to serve a 10-year sentence. The country's high court meets in private and does not publicize its verdicts, so it is unknown when the appeal was actually rejected.
Guterres' conviction marks only the second time that a court in Indonesia has punished someone over the East Timor [JURIST news archive; HRW backgrounder] violence that left more than 1,400 people dead and the capital, Dili, largely demolished after citizens voted against continuing under Indonesian rule. In January, East Timor President Xanana Gusmao [BBC profile] presented a report [JURIST report] to the UN alleging widespread atrocities committed by the Indonesian government while it ruled the country. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russia confirms Milosevic letter, wants to review post mortem results
Bernard Hibbitts on March 13, 2006 9:17 AM ET

[JURIST] Russian Foreign Ministry officials confirmed Monday that they had received a letter written by Slobodan Milosevic [JURIST news archive] on March 8 complaining about his medical care while in prison at The Hague and pressed for Russian medical experts to participate in his post mortem. A Ministry spokesman said in a statement: In this handwritten letter Slobodan Milosevic speaks of the inadequate treatment administered by doctors of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia [sic] and again asks for the Russian Federation's support in obtaining permission to undergo a therapeutic course in a medical establishment in Moscow. The spokesman also said that at the request of the family Russia would be sending a team of doctors to The Hague to "participate in the post mortem examination", initial results of which indicated Sunday that the former Yugoslav president on trial for war crimes died of a heart attack. A Health Ministry official said the medical team would be from the Bakulev Institute [RIA Novosti report], where Milosevic had wanted to be treated, and would also include Russia's chief pathologist. The ICTY Trial Chamber ruled against Milosevic's application for provisional release [JURIST report] for medical treatment in Russia late last month because it was not satisfied that he would return to face the remainder of his trial. The former Yugoslav president was found dead in his prison cell [JURIST report] Saturday. It is not yet clear whether the ICTY will allow the Russian team to take part in the post mortem or review its full results, but Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters Monday "In the situation where we were distrusted, we also have the right to distrust." Reuters has more.
Meanwhile a Dutch toxicologist has told Reuters that based on blood tests he conducted on Milosevic two weeks ago showed that he had taken rifampicin, a drug used to treat leprosy and tuberculosis that would have countered the effects of Milosevic's heart medication. Groningen University's Donald Uges rejected any suggestions of murder or suicide, however, suggesting instead that Milosevic was trying to worsen his condition so the war crimes tribunal would send him to Moscow for treatment. Reuters has more. If Milosevic was obtaining and taking this drug on his own, without the supervision of doctors at the ICTY's Scheveningen Detention Unit, it would not have been the first time [BBC report] he had taken unprescribed medications.
5:35 PM ET - AP has published the text of Milosevic's letter to the Russian Foreign Ministry in an English translated provided by lawyer Zdenko Tomanovic:To the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation.
Dear ladies and gentlemen,
With my acknowledgment for the solidarity and understanding which you expressed by accepting to receive me to come for medical treatment and by giving guarantees, I would like to inform you about the following:
I think that the persistence, with which the medical treatment in Russia was denied, in the first place is motivated by the fear that through careful examination it would be discovered, that there were active, willful steps taken, to destroy my health, throughout the proceedings of the trial, which could not be hidden from Russian specialists.
In order to verify my allegations, I'm presenting you a simple example which you can find in the attachment. This document, which I received on March 7, shows that on January 12th (i.e. two months ago), an extremely strong drug was found in my blood, which is used, as they themselves say, for the treatment of tuberculosis and leprosy, although I never used any kind of antibiotic during this 5 years that I'm in their prison.
Throughout this whole period, neither have I had any kind of infectious illness (apart from flu).
Also the fact that doctors needed 2 months (to report to me), can't have any other explanation than we are facing manipulation. In any case, those who foist on me a drug against leprosy surely can't treat my illness; likewise those from which I defended my country in times of war and who have an interest to silence me.
Dear Sirs, it is known to you that Russian physicians, who rank among the most respected physicians in the world, came to the conclusion that the examination and treatment of the vascular problems in my head are inevitable and urgent. I know very well that this is true, as I feel very bad.
I'm addressing you in expectation that you help me defend my health from the criminal activities in this institution, working under the sign of the U.N., and that I be enabled as soon as possible to get adequate treatment in your hospital, in whose physicians, as well as in Russia, I have absolute confidence.
Yours sincerely,
Slobodan Milosevic


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

British SAS soldier cites illegality of US Iraq tactics as reason for resigning
Tatyana Margolin on March 13, 2006 7:18 AM ET

[JURIST Europe] A member of the elite Special Air Service [Wikipedia profile] special forces of the British Army [official website] who refused to return to Iraq and later left British military service said in an interview published in the UK Sunday that he resigned because he objected to the illegality of the war and its tactics, especially as conducted by US forces. Ben Griffin admitted that he did not think that the British government made a good case for the Iraqi war but that he went to Iraq because he felt that he had to follow orders. Afterwards, however, he decided that he "didn't join the British army to conduct American foreign policy."
Griffin questioned the legality of many actions he saw undertaken by US troops in Iraq, such as taking into custody men who were clearly civilians and uninvolved with insurgents. He told the Daily Telegraph: The Americans had this catch-all approach to lifting suspects. The tactics were draconian and completely ineffective. The Americans were doing things like chucking farmers into Abu Ghraib or handing them over to the Iraqi authorities, knowing full well they were going to be tortured....
As far as the Americans were concerned, the Iraqi people were sub-human, untermenschen. You could almost split the Americans into two groups: ones who were complete crusaders, intent on killing Iraqis, and the others who were in Iraq because the Army was going to pay their college fees. They had no understanding or interest in the Arab culture. The Americans would talk to the Iraqis as if they were stupid and these weren't isolated cases, this was from the top down. There might be one or two enlightened officers who understood the situation a bit better but on the whole that was their general attitude. Their attitude fuelled the insurgency. I think the Iraqis detested them. After Griffin refused to go back to Iraq in March of last year he thought he would be arrested and court-martialed, but instead he was discharged with glowing testimonies from his superiors. His case may have an impact on others who have refused to fight in Iraq on moral grounds, like Flt. Lt. Malcolm Kendall-Smith [JURIST report], a Royal Air Force [official website] doctor who has refused to return to Iraq for a third tour of duty on the grounds that the war is illegal. A pre-trial hearing for his UK court martial begins on Wednesday. AFP has more. The Telegraph has local coverage here and here.
Tatyana Margolin is an Associate Editor for JURIST Europe, reporting European legal news from a European perspective. She is based in the UK.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|