 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, March 5, 2006 |
 |
|


Civil liberties panel recommended by 9/11 Commission finally getting under way
Katerina Ossenova on March 5, 2006 4:45 PM ET

[JURIST] The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board created by the US Congress in December 2004 implementing a recommendation [CRS backgrounder] from the 9/11 Commission [official website] will finally begin to function later this month when the Board's five members are sworn in at the White House and convene their first session, according to Newsweek magazine Sunday. In association with its counter-terrorism recommendations, the 9/11 Commission final report [PDF] called for the creation of "a board within the executive branch to oversee adherence to guidelines on, and the commitment to defend, civil liberties by the federal government." The first nominations for the board were not made until June 2005, however, and the President's FY 2006 budget [text] contained no requests for funds for the panel. 9/11 Commission chairman Thomas Kean [official profile] has called the delay "outrageous", emphasizing its need at a time of ever- increasing executive powers, and claims that the White House and congressional leaders have denied the board basic tools and limited its scope. In December, Kean and 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton gave the Bush administration a "D" for its lack of support of the board in the context of a more general and largely negative report card [PDF] on the government's response to 9/11 Commission recommendations. The composition of and structure of the board has also been criticized by legal experts and rights groups. A bipartisan group of 23 members of Congress - led by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Christopher Shays (R-CT) - last week urged the administration [letter, PDF] to give the board adequate resources and support legislation to broaden its powers.
President Bush has nominated [press release] Carol Dinkins [firm profile], a Texas lawyer and former senior Justice Department official, as board chairman. The panel is expected to address issues such as the domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive], the Patriot Act [JURIST news archive], and Pentagon data mining. Newsweek has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

World Christian leaders criticize Guantanamo detentions
Elizabeth Schultz on March 5, 2006 12:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Leaders of the both the Anglican and Roman Catholic churches have sharply criticized the US prison at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] as international pressure builds to close down the controversial facility that currently contains almost 500 individuals the US government has termed enemy combatants. Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams [official profile], the English head of the worldwide Anglican communion that includes the Episcopal Church in the United States, called Guantanamo "an extraordinary legal anomaly" Sunday in a BBC interview, echoing language previously used [JURIST report] by UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. He added, "Any message given that any state can just override some of the basic habeas corpus-type provisions is going to be very welcome to tyrants elsewhere in the world, now and in the future," apparently referring to US government contentions [JURIST report] that the Constitution does not guarantee aliens held by the US abroad a right to habeas corpus. Williams' statement follows even more direct criticism of the US leveled by Archbishop of York John Sentamu, the number-two cleric in the Church of England, who last week slammed [ACNS release] Blair's language and Guantanamo in no uncertain terms: This is not an anomaly. By declaring war on terror President Bush is perversely applying the rules of engagement which apply in a war situation. But the prisoners are not being regularly visited by the Red Cross or Red Crescent, which is required by the Geneva Convention. They were not even allowed to be interviewed by the United Nations Human Rights Group.
In Uganda President Amin did something similar: he did not imprison suspects because he knew that in prison the law would apply to them, so he created special places to keep them. If the Guantanamo Bay detainees were on American soil, the law would apply. This is a breach of international law and a blight on the conscience of America. Reuters has more.
Meanwhile Vatican [official website, English] minister for justice and peace Cardinal Renato Martino, speaking to the Italian news agency ANSA after a trip to Cuba, said Friday that, "It seems clear that in this prison man's dignity is not being respected at all." Martino's criticism was the Vatican's first direct comment on Guantanamo. Jang News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|