Senate Democrats press inconsistencies in Alito testimony Holly Manges Jones at 2:07 PM ET
[JURIST] Democratic senators on the US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] Wednesday pressed apparent inconsistencies in answers to questions by Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito [official profile; JURIST news archive] during his third day of his confirmation hearings. Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) [official website] contrasted Alito's Tuesday testimony that he would keep an "open mind" [JURIST report] on any future abortion cases before the Supreme Court with other testimony and writings [JURIST report] by Alito that Durbin said suggested "a mind that sadly is closed in some instances." Senate Democrats also pressed the issue of Alito's participation in a 2002 Vanguard [corporate website] case, despite holding six-figure investments with the company, after promising [JURIST report] the Judiciary Committee in 1990 that he would recuse himself from cases that presented such a conflict of interest. Republican senators defended Alito's testimony; Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) [official website] accused the Democrats of "grasping at any straw to tarnish [Alito's] record." AP has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.