Rights group claims independence of Saddam judges at risk

[JURIST] US-based monitoring group Human Rights Watch [advocacy website], said [press release] Saturday that interference by Iraqi political groups may compromise the independence of the judges on the Iraqi High Criminal Court - formerly the Iraqi Special Tribunal [official website] - conducting the Saddam Hussein trial [JURIST news archive]. HRW claims the tribunal's judicial independence and even the fairness of its basic proceedings has been impaired by events such as the resignation [JURIST report] of top judge Rizqar Mohammed Amin [Wikipedia profile] amid criticism from Iraqi politicians and the transfer of initial replacement judge Sayeed al-Hammash [JURIST report] amid allegations he was a member of Saddam's Baath Party [BBC backgrounder], which he denies. Human Rights Watch also said that the non-appearance of several witnesses was another concern. The trial, which began October 19 [JURIST report], is scheduled to resume Sunday in Baghdad after a monthlong break that was extended when proceedings failed to reconvene as scheduled [JURIST report] on Tuesday. AP has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.