 |
|

Legal news from Friday, January 20, 2006 |
 |
|


California death penalty moratorium blocked
Jaime Jansen on January 20, 2006 3:27 PM ET

[JURIST] A California [JURIST news archive] proposal for a two-year death penalty [JURIST news archive] moratorium hit a permanent stumbling block in the California Assembly's Appropriations Committee Thursday. The moratorium proposal [PDF text] intended to suspend executions in California until a commission completed a review of California's death penalty, including an analysis of any condemned inmates who were wrongly convicted. Democratic Assemblyman Paul Koretz, the bill's sponsor, said he hopes to revive the effort in another proposal later this year. A number of DNA tests have exonerated death row inmates in recent years, prompting Illinois, and more recently New Jersey [JURIST report], to suspend executions. New Jersey became the first state to impose a moratorium via legislation last week, placing a moratorium on executions that will last until 60 days after a special commission releases its findings. California has approximately 650 inmates on death row, the largest of any state, and has exonerated six people with DNA tests. The state recently executed two inmates: Clarence Ray Allen [JURIST report], the oldest person on death row, and Stanley Tookie Williams [JURIST report], the infamous Crips gang co-founder. AP has more. The LA Times has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Canada PM accuses opposition leader of planning to politicize high court
Bernard Hibbitts on January 20, 2006 1:35 PM ET

[JURIST] In a last-minute push to regain popular support in the final stages of the Canadian federal election campaign, Prime Minister Paul Martin has accused Conservative Party [party website] leader Stephen Harper [official profile] of planning to pack the Supreme Court of Canada [official website] with judges who would advance a socially-conservative agenda, override the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [text], outlaw same-sex marriage again and push Canada towards the views of the "extreme right" in the United States. Speaking in Toronto Thursday, Martin asked Is Mr. Harper saying that he will be appointing judges to the Supreme Court based really on their political views? Are we going to find ourselves in the same situation that they are in the United States, where in fact it is not only the competence of a judge that governs, but in fact it is a judge's social views?Are we going to see a situation where what we're going to do is try to pack the court in order to overturn Charter rights?" Martin also slammed Harper' comments earlier in the week that "activist" judges prevented him from ever having a "true majority" [JURIST report], even in the event of an election victory:He talked about the courts standing between him and absolute power. Who talks that way? Who thinks that way? He spoke of the courts as his political opponents. He described them as an obstacle. A barrier between him and his agenda. Canadian polls still show the Conservatives leading, but their lead has apparently topped out or even started to slip in some areas, with Martin's Liberals vowing to press their counterattack - seen by some as increasingly desperate - right up to the January 23 vote. The Toronto Globe and Mail has local coverage. The Liberal Party has also issued a press release.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Eleven indicted in ecoterrorism arson plot
James M Yoch Jr on January 20, 2006 1:30 PM ET

[JURIST] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile] on Friday unsealed the indictment [press release; speech text] of eleven people alleged to have carried out a series of arsons causing millions of dollars in damage in five Western states between 1996 and 2001 for the extremist ecology groups Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and Animal Liberation Front (ALF). The indictment [PDF text], returned by a federal grand jury on Thursday, included 65 counts of domestic terrorism on 17 sites in California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming, including US Forest Service ranger stations, Bureau of Land Management wild horse facilities, meat processing companies, lumber companies, a high-tension power line, and a ski facility in Colorado. Eight of the indicted defendants were arrested [JURIST report] last month, while three defendants believed to be outside the US remain at large. The cases will be prosecuted by the US Attorney's Office for the District of Oregon [official website]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Cheney defends NSA wiretapping program
Asha Puttaiah on January 20, 2006 8:39 AM ET

[JURIST] US Vice President Dick Cheney [official website] on Thursday defended the Bush administration's authorization of domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] in the weeks following Sept. 11, saying the program is a crucial tool in monitoring terrorist organizations. In a speech [transcript] at the Manhattan Institute, Cheney objected to the characterization of the program as "domestic", stressing that the National Security Agency [official website] only intercepts "international communications, one end of which we have reason to believe is related to al Qaeda or to terrorist networks affiliated with al Qaeda." Cheney called the program "fully consistent with the constitutional responsibilities and legal authority of the President" and further defended its legality and importance: These actions are within the President's authority and responsibility under the Constitution and laws; and these actions are vital to our security. This is a wartime measure, limited in scope to surveillance associated with terrorists, and conducted in a way that safeguards the civil liberties of our people. It is important to note that leaders of Congress have been briefed more than a dozen times on the President's authorization, and on the activities conducted under it. I've personally presided over most of those briefings. In addition, the entire program undergoes a thorough review within the executive branch every 45 days. After each review, the President determines once again whether or not to reauthorize the program. He has done so more than 30 times since September 11th -- and he has indicated his intent to do so as long as our nation faces a continuing threat from al Qaeda and related organizations. Cheney's remarks came the same day as the US Justice Department released a white paper [PDF text; JURIST report] laying out a legal basis for the program. The Bush administration has also come under fire for its limited briefings on the program. Only certain members of Congress, rather than the full House and Senate Intelligence Committees, have been briefed, and a Congressional Research Service report [PDF text; JURIST report] released Thursday concluded that the limited briefings are "inconsistent with the law." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|