Saddam defense team questions court legitimacy, security as trial resumes

[JURIST] Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin, presiding over the trial of Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive], on Monday allowed former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ex-Qatari Justice Minister Najib al-Nueimi to address the court on the safety of the defense lawyers involved in the trial, reversing an earlier ruling which led the defense team to walk out [Reuters report] of the session at the Iraqi High Criminal Court (formerly the Iraqi Special Tribunal [official website]). The lawyers' departure led to chaotic shouting in the courtroom and an outburst from Hussein. Amin also permitted the defense team to address the legitimacy of the tribunal, and al-Nueimi argued that the court was set up under the US-led occupation and not a legal Iraqi government. Hussein and his co-defendants are charged with murder, torture, forced expulsions and illegal imprisonment stemming from the 1982 massacre in Dujail [JURIST report] and could face the death penalty if found guilty. AP has more. In a related development, it was disclosed that one of the trial judges had stepped down and was being replaced after learning that a defendant might have been involved in his brother's execution. The Telegraph has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.