 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, December 27, 2005 |
 |
|


FISC changes to post-2001 Bush wiretap requests may have prompted end-run
Joshua Pantesco on December 27, 2005 1:42 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) [constituitive statute] substantively modified 179 Bush administration wiretap requests made after 2001, after declining to modify a single request in 20 of the 21 years between 1979 and 1999, according to an analysis of Justice Department statistics [FAS FISA materials] reported Tuesday by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. The FISC also rejected or modified at least 6 warrant requests during 2003 and 2004. Administration requests for electronic and physical searches similarly rose from 3,436 in 1997 through 2000 to 5,645 applications from 2001 through 2004. FISC resistance to wiretap requests may have driven the Bush Administration to authorize [JURIST report; JURIST news archive] warrantless phone and email tracking of US residents, said James Bamford [Wikipedia profile], author of two books on the National Security Agency. According to the FISC statute, enacted in 1979, the Department of Justice must show "probable cause" that "the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power," and has committed acts that "may" involve a violation of criminal law in order to secure a wiretap. Referring to the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act administered by the FISC, US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said [press briefing] last week that though "the FISA is very important in the war on terror...it doesn't provide the speed and the agility that we need in all circumstances to deal with this new kind of threat." A FISC judge has already resigned in protest [JURIST report] over the NSA domestic surveillance program, and the Bush administration has agreed to brief [JURIST report] the remaining judges on the scope of the program. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thousands in Baghdad protest Iraq election 'fraud'
Alexandria Samuel on December 27, 2005 11:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Over 10,000 Iraqis took to the streets of Baghdad Tuesday to protest alleged fraud in the December 15 parliamentary elections in Iraq [JURIST report]. Complaints of fraud surfaced almost immediately after the polls closed [JURIST report], with the majority of allegations coming from a group that lead Tuesday's demonstrations, the Maram (in Arabic, "goal") alliance, a coalition of Sunni Arab and Shiite secular groups who contend that Shiite-based religious groups "rigged polls" to gain power. Maram members are demanding that officials vacate the election results and establish a coalition government with an adequate balance of power among groups. Preliminary poll results [IECI text, PDF] show that the Shiite United Iraqi Alliance has won a large majority of the votes. This is the second major demonstration against the election results in a week; on Friday, some 20,000 demonstrators marched in west Baghdad [video clip via Iraq the Model]. BBC News has more. From Baghdad, the author of the Iraq the Model weblog offers local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|