 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, December 6, 2005 |
 |
|


California Chief Justice urges more expedient executions
Joshua Pantesco on December 6, 2005 8:59 PM ET

[JURIST] California Supreme Court Chief Justice and Republican appointee Ronald George [official profile] said in a Reuters interview Tuesday that the state should execute death row inmates within five years of sentencing or reprieve them, as opposed to waiting for twenty years or more as it does now. This issue has received increased attention in light of the upcoming execution of former Crips [NAGIA backgrounder] gang co-founder Stanley Tookie Williams [advocacy website], who has been on death row since 1981. "If people want to have the death penalty, then I think sufficient resources should be provided to carry out the process in a timely way," George said. "I would think in most instances this should be finalized with either an affirmance or a reversal within perhaps five years, let's say, but not 20." Since 1978, California has executed 11 men, while 48 have died of illness, suicide, or other causes. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House set to debate terrorism insurance bill extension
Joshua Pantesco on December 6, 2005 8:09 PM ET

[JURIST] A bill [PDF text] renewing the 2002 Terrorism Risk Insurance Act [text] will be debated in the US House of Representatives later this week, according to acting House Majority Leader Roy Blunt (R-MS) [official website]. The original law, passed after 9/11 and set to expire on December 31, 2005, required insurers to offer terrorism insurance but capped private insurance company liability at $5 million, with the government reimbursing any excess liability. The Senate version of the bill [PDF text], passed last month and supported by the White House, increases the cap to $50 million in 2006 and $100 million in 2007. Some insurers and homeowners would like to see the original bill extended in its current form, saying that it promotes construction and economic progress. Leaders expect the bill to be swiftly passed, as the House is operating under a suspension calendar this week, where bills require a two-thirds majority to pass and debate is limited to 40 minutes. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Military trials set for Canadian, Yemeni Guantanamo detainees
Joshua Pantesco on December 6, 2005 7:04 PM ET

[JURIST] The Pentagon announced Tuesday that military commission trials for two foreign Guantanamo prisoners will begin with plea hearings on January 10 at the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST archive] detention facility without waiting for the US Supreme Court to decide the legality of such tribunals. The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report], where it will decide whether the president has the power to authorize military commissions for foreign citizens in the war on terror. The two detainees whose trials have been scheduled are Canadian Omar Ahmed Kadhr, charged [Pentagon charge sheet, PDF] last month with murder, and Yemeni Ali Hamza Ahmed Sulayman al Bahlul, charged [Pentagon charge sheet, PDF] in 2004 with conspiracy. The charges were approved [DoD press release] by the Department of Defense early last month. Nine Guantanamo Bay detainees have so far been charged with war crimes ; the trials of three other charged detainees, including David Hicks [JURIST report], are currently under judicial stay until the resolution of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US high court hears military recruitment case on law school access
Greg Sampson on December 6, 2005 3:13 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday heard oral arguments [recorded audio, via C-SPAN] in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic Rights (FAIR) [Duke Law backgrounder; merit briefs], concerning whether the Solomon Amendment [text; FAIR backgrounder], a federal law that requires educational institutions, including law schools, to allow military recruiters on campus in order to receive federal funds, violates universities' First Amendment right of association. The Solomon Amendment was first passed in 1994, in response to university law schools banning military recruiters because the Defense Department's exclusion of homosexuals violated their non-discrimination policies. FAIR [advocacy website], an association of 36 law schools and law faculties, sued US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to prevent enforcement of the federal law. During arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts [JURIST news archive] suggested that campuses that didn't agree with the policy could simply refuse federal funds. However, opponents of the Solomon Amendment argue that federal money makes up a substantial amount of campus funding, and forgoing it would be impossible. Justice David Souter [Oyez profile] voiced his concern that tying federal funding to military recruiters' access to campus could hinder the free speech rights of universities. AP has more. FAIR offers additional material on the Solomon Amendment and law school policies on on-campus military recruitment.
Also Tuesday, the Court heard arguments in Domino's Pizza v. McDonald [Duke Law backgrounder; merit briefs], where the Court is deciding whether a Nevada businessman should be allowed to sue Domino's Pizza [corporate website] for racial discrimination even though he did not have an individual contract with the company. McDonald sued the pizza chain under an 1866 civil rights law that protects equal rights in contracting alleging that Domino's refused to honor its construction contracts with McDonald's company because he is black. During arguments Tuesday, justices questioned whether McDonald had standing to bring the suit because he was not an individual party to the contract. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Pinochet faces new human rights charges
Katerina Ossenova on December 6, 2005 9:58 AM ET

[JURIST] Chilean Judge Victor Montiglio announced Tuesday that former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] will face a new round of human rights charges. As the judge continues to investigate Pinochet's role in Operation Colombo [Wikipedia backgrounder], where a dozen members of the opposition were allegedly kidnapped and murdered, he found enough evidence to connect Pinochet to the abduction of three more dissidents. Last month, Pinochet was charged in the disappearance of six dissidents [JURIST report] during the Operation Colombo campaign. Montiglio, however, dropped the charges in connection to the disappearance of four other dissents since those accusations were earlier dismissed by a military tribunal. Calling this as a "judicial mistake", prosecutor Boris Paredes plans to appeal the decision. Earlier this month, a panel of judges rejected the defense's argument that Pinochet was too ill to face trial [JURIST report] and he is now under house arrest. In addition to the human rights violations, Pinochet faces tax evasion and corruption charges [JURIST report]. More than 3,000 people were killed while Pinochet was in power from 1973 to 1990. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China denies UN torture allegations
Sara R. Parsowith on December 6, 2005 8:35 AM ET

[JURIST] China on Tuesday denied the findings [JURIST report] of UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Manfred Nowak [official profile, DOC] who, after a two-week visit [JURIST report] to China, criticized the country for the widespread torture and abuse of prisoners. Nowak, a UN envoy acting on behalf of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) [official website], also said his investigation was hindered [press release] by the Chinese government. Chinese Foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Tuesday that torture was banned in China and that Nowak's findings, based on evidence that suspects were routinely beaten by police, "lacks an objective foundation and does not accord with reality." Earlier this year, the Chinese parliament passed a bill that mandates punishment for police who torture detainees during interrogation [JURIST report]. However, Nowak has said deeper reforms are required and that China has the need for an independent judiciary and independent monitoring mechanisms. There have been a recent slew of cases in China where people have been wrongly convicted after giving forced confessions. For example, in April, She Xianglin, was finally released [China Daily report] after he had spent 11 years in jail for allegedly murdering his wife after the woman turned up alive. She said he had confessed to the crime under torture. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Terror suspects moved from CIA prisons in Europe to North Africa: report
Sara R. Parsowith on December 6, 2005 8:00 AM ET

[JURIST] The US held eleven captured al Qaeda suspects at two secret CIA prisons [JURIST report] in Eastern Europe until media reports exposing the existence of the prisons shut down the facilities last month, ABC News reported Monday. The prisoners were then hastily relocated [Reuters report] to a CIA facility in North Africa prior to the arrival of US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice [JURIST report] in Europe. Rice's presence is an attempt to defuse increasing pressure [JURIST report] by EU lawmakers who have demanded a deeper investigation [JURIST report] into the existence of the alleged secret prisons. In a speech [transcript; JURIST report] Monday before departing on her Europe trip, Rice defended the CIA's rendition practices and said the US does not use torture, but didn't directly address the allegations of covert European prisons. Rice did say, however, that US sharing intelligence with its allies has "helped protect European countries from attack, saving European lives." Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] criticized Rice's speech, saying she mischaracterized [press release] the US government's rendition practices and expressed concern that Rice makes "extra-legal rendition sound like just another form of extradition," when it is really "a form of kidnapping and 'disappearing' someone entirely outside the law." Results of an AP poll released Tuesday revealed that around two-thirds of people living in Canada, Mexico, South Korea and Spain, where the CIA is said to be conducting secret investigations, said they would oppose allowing the US to secretly interrogate terror suspects [poll results, PDF] in their countries, with a similar number in Britain, France, Germany and Italy noting the same. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

First female witness testifies at Saddam trial
Sara R. Parsowith on December 6, 2005 7:36 AM ET

[JURIST] "Witness A," the first woman to testify in the Saddam Hussein trial [JURIST news archive], gave her testimony Tuesday behind a curtain and with her voice distorted by computer to protect her identity, despite some technical problems which caused a short delay. Witness A continued to describe how she was forced to strip while in prison custody, a day after two witnesses gave testimony of torture [JURIST report] and summary execution, including reports of the use of electric shocks and a meat grinder, which sparked outrage by Hussein. In response, Judge Chief Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin Tuesday cautioned the defendants to be careful about how they talked to witnesses. Amid discussion on the fairness of the trial [JURIST report], Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari said Tuesday that the trial was fair [AFP report] and that Hussein's outbursts are indicative of a democratic process since the court is "giving him ample opportunity to talk." Al-Jaafari attributed Hussein's behavior in part to the fact that the trial is televised, adding that Hussein can't stay silent in front of a camera. Hussein and his co-defendants are charged with murder, torture, forced expulsions and illegal imprisonment stemming from the 1982 massacre in Dujail [JURIST report] and could face the death penalty if found guilty by the Iraqi High Criminal Court (formerly the Iraqi Special Tribunal [official website]). AP has more.
2:04 PM ET - AP provides excerpts from Witness A's testimony.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|