Lawmakers flag legal problems with Bush proposal for military role in disaster relief Chris Buell at 7:58 PM ET
[JURIST] US lawmakers Wednesday expressed some discomfort with a proposal by the Bush administration to increase the response role [JURIST report] of the US Department of Defense [official website] in disasters during a hearing of a House Armed Services Committee [official website] subcommittee. House members questioned whether such a plan would leave the military stretched too thin, and also noted that the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 [text; NORTHCOM factsheet] could stand in the way. Although there has been discussion among some legislators about reforming the Act [JURIST report] in the wake of Hurricane Katrina [JURIST news archive], others have expressed concern that reforms might infringe on local and state officials [2001 Congressional testimony on potential legal and other problems with federalizing the National Guard during state emergencies, PDF] better-suited to handle disasters. The Act prevents the US military from serving a law enforcement role on US soil absent certain exceptions. The Committee has transcripts from the hearing. Assistant Defense Secretary Paul McHale [official profile] told committee members that the Pentagon would serve a supporting role to the Department of Homeland Security's efforts, while National Guard head Lt. Gen. H. Steven Blum [official profile] said that state governors would remain empowered in disaster sites. AP has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.