Judge upholds terror conviction despite doubts over US handling of case Chris Buell at 4:32 PM ET
[JURIST] A federal judge Wednesday refused to overturn the conviction of an aide to Osama bin Laden [JURIST news archive] despite expressing doubts about the US government's handling of its case. US District Judge Kevin Duffy, in a 109-page ruling, wrote that he had serious reservations in upholding the conviction of Wadih El-Hage [PBS profile] due to the suppression of evidence by the US Marshals Service [official website]. El-Hage and three others were convicted and sentenced to death in 2001 for conspiracy in the bombing of two US embassies in Africa that killed 224 people. El-Hage appealed the conviction, with his lawyers arguing that the government failed to provide them with videotaped interviews of Jamal al-Fadl, an al-Qaida member and the prosecution's top witness in the case. Defense lawyers received transcripts of 28 hours of interviews with al-Fadl more than 15 months after El-Hage was sentenced, but prosecutors said they did not find out about the existence of the videotapes until 2002. AP has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.