 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, November 29, 2005 |
 |
|


Italian judge denies immunity claim of CIA agent accused in kidnapping plot
Joshua Pantesco on November 29, 2005 7:11 PM ET

[JURIST] An Italian judge ruled Tuesday that a former CIA station chief in Milan is not protected by diplomatic immunity, upholding an arrest warrant issued for his alleged participation in the kidnapping of Egyptian cleric Osama Moustafa Hassan Nasr [Wikipedia profile]. The judge held that even though former agent and US diplomatic consul Robert Seldon Lady relinquished all immunity when he left his post in August 2004, the protection given to consular officials is "always within the limits of international law." Furthermore, "within these limits, naturally, is the principle of the sovereignty of the host state that cannot allow on its territory the use of force by a foreign state that outside every control of the political and judicial authorities." Earlier this month Italian prosecutors requested the extradition of 22 former CIA agents [JURIST report], including Lady, who is currently in the US. Italian prosecutors claim that the agents abducted Nasr, an alleged terrorist, in Milan on Feburary 17 2003 and flew him to Egypt, where he was reportedly tortured. Though Lady's lawyer claims the evidence against him is weak, and the Italian justice Minister has cast doubts on the impartiality of the investigation [JURIST report], prosecutors say they can prove through cell phone and computer records that Lady played a central role in the abduction. The Guardian has more.
Previously in JURIST's Paper Chase...


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ defends use of National Security Letters
Joshua Pantesco on November 29, 2005 6:15 PM ET

[JURIST] US Assistant Attorney General William E. Moschella [official profile] defended the use of National Security Letters [PDF sample text; ACLU materials] in a 10-page letter sent to the Chairmen of the US House and Senate Judiciary Committees Tuesday, rebutting claims raised by a Washington Post article [text] that NSLs have been used to spy on law-abiding citizens. NSLs allow the FBI to obtain private phone, internet, and business records; while most information about their use remains classified, Moschella claims that the FBI has not issued over 30,000 a year, as claimed by the Post article, nor have they used the letters to spy on innocent citizens. He nonetheless admitted that some citizens whose records are accessed "may not be terrorists or spies or associated with terrorists or spies." House and Senate negotiators have reached a tentative agreement [JURIST report] to renew several Patriot Act provisions affecting the use of NSLs, including one that requires the Justice Department to report annually to Congress on the number of NSLs issued that year, and one that allows recipients to consult a lawyer before complying. A lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] said that though the government may obtain such information, "I think the American people would prefer that there be some sort of connection and if not, then the records ought to be destroyed." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights official blasts Haitian justice system
Greg Sampson on November 29, 2005 3:08 PM ET

[JURIST] Louis Joinet, a UN official assigned to oversee the human rights conditions in Haiti [JURIST news archive], on Tuesday sharply criticized the Haitian justice system for detaining hundreds of people without charge, including Reverend Gerard Jean-Juste [BBC report], a political leader and member of the political party of ousted president Jean-Bertrand Aristide [BBC profile]. Joinet characterized Jean-Juste as a political prisoner. Although the prison population in Haiti is unknown, the National Penitentiary in Port-au-Prince currently holds more than 1,700 prisoners, only a few dozen of whom have been charged. In February, the National Penitentiary was the site of a serious prison riot [JURIST report]. In October, the UN warned [JURIST report] that the human rights situation in Haiti had become "catastrophic". AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules on federal court jurisdiction in diversity lawsuits
Kate Heneroty on November 29, 2005 10:47 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday handed down a unanimous decision in Lincoln Property v. Roche [Duke Law backgrounder], reversing the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, holding that a lawsuit filed in state court may be removed to federal court if all parties actually named are diverse. The case involved Virginia renters who sued their landlord, a Texas-based property company, for injuries resulting from exposure to toxic mold. In ruling for the defendant, the Court emphasized that defendants must actually be joined in the suit, not merely a "real party in interest," to destroy complete diversity of citizenship. Justice Ginsburg wrote, "The potential liability of other parties was a matter plaintiffs' counsel might have assiduously explored" through further investigation. The court dismissed as "not live for adjudication" the second issue in the case [SCOTUSblog report], concerning whether a firm that does business in several states must be determined to be a citizen of any state in which one of its entities was located. Read the Court's opinion [text]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Aljazeera considering legal action against Bush after bombing memo
Kate Heneroty on November 29, 2005 9:09 AM ET

[JURIST] Arab news channel Aljazeera [media website] is considering taking legal action against President George W. Bush, after disclosures that the US president allegedly suggested bombing the broadcaster's headquarters in Doha, Qatar, in the spring of 2004. Last week, two British civil servants were charged with leaking a memo [JURIST report], in which British Prime Minister Tony Blair [official profile] supposedly talked Bush out of the bombing. Blair denies knowledge [Aljazeera report] of any such plan. The White House has previously criticized Aljazeera for airing videos from Osama bin Laden [JURIST news archive], yet the station maintains it does not broadcast propaganda. In November 2002, no one was injured when the US bombed Aljazeera's office in Kabul, Afghanistan, because they believed it to be a terrorist site. In April 2003, an Aljazeera journalist was killed when a US missile accidentally struck his Baghdad office. In a statement released Tuesday, the station said [Aljazeera statement] if the memo was authentic, "it would cast serious doubts in regard to the US administration's version of previous incidents involving al-Jazeera's journalists and offices." Employees have called for an investigation into the memo and the station is currently consulting with its lawyers over potential legal action. In the UK, meanwhile, the government has threatened to prosecute newspapers [JURIST report] under the UK Official Secrets Act [text] if they reveal details of the memo. Additionally, the two civil servants charged last week appeared in court [BBC report] Tuesday and are expected to plead not guilty. The Guardian has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Katrina victims ask for extended hotel stays in FEMA lawsuit
Sara R. Parsowith on November 29, 2005 8:13 AM ET

[JURIST] Lawyers for victims of Hurricane Katrina [JURIST news archive] Monday asked for an extension of a program which houses displaced New Orleans residents in hotels at government expense, at an estimated $3 million per day, totaling $300 million since August 29. The request to keep the hotel program going is the latest filing in the class action lawsuit [JURIST report; PDF complaint] with 23 named plaintiffs accusing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [official website] of the wrongful denial of housing benefits to Katrina victims. FEMA had given the program a December 1 expiration date, but later extended it to December 15 after critics said this would lead to the eviction of thousands who are displaced and impoverished. In addition, 10 states - Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Tennessee and Texas - are able to apply for extensions that would last until January 7. Attorneys are seeking to extend this date even further. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Restitution will threaten Croatian state, president says
Sara R. Parsowith on November 29, 2005 7:52 AM ET

[JURIST] Croatian President Stjepan Mesic [official website; Wikipedia profile] said Monday that Croatia may cease to function as a state if the government returns property to Austrian citizens that had been confiscated by Yugoslav communists after World War II as planned. During WWII, the Ustasa regime [Wikipedia backgrounder], allied with the Nazi party, governed Croatia and hundreds of Jews, Serbs and Gypsies were deported to concentration camps. Yugoslavia's communist authorities expelled 60,000 Germans after 1945 and confiscated their property and many fled to Austria. The government on the weekend announced a deal with Vienna under which Germans who obtained Austrian citizenship after fleeing Yugoslavia had a right to file for the return of their property or get compensation. Yugoslavia had banned all foreigners from reclaiming the property but lifted the ban after gaining independence in 1991, when the country's constitutional court deemed it illegal to ban foreigners from reclaiming property. Mesic claims the deal with Austria was reached behind his back and the deal has also been denounced by Social Democratic Leader and former prime minister Ivica Racan [Wikipedia backgrounder], who has said that "[m]aking deals with Austria without tackling the issue of Croats who perished in concentration camps in Austria, Italy or Germany is morally and politically unacceptable." Croatia's government defended the agreement [Hina report], saying that the deal is based on a 1999 constitutional court decision [text] requiring the government to pay compensation to foreign citizens whose property had been confiscated. The deal needs to be approved by Parliament with a two-thirds majority. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|