 |
|

Legal news from Friday, November 18, 2005 |
 |
|


Former CIA director calls Cheney 'vice president for torture'
Holly Manges Jones on November 18, 2005 1:50 PM ET

[JURIST] A former director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] has called US Vice President Dick Cheney [official website] a "vice president for torture," saying that the Bush administration condones and even approves torture policies. Admiral Stansfield Turner, a Carter administration appointee who led the CIA from 1977 to 1981, spoke to Britain's ITV News [ITV report] and said Cheney was damaging America's reputation by overseeing torture policies for potential terrorist suspects. Turner said that torturing to elicit information from terror suspects is immoral, not effective, and encourages the country's adversaries to do the same. The admiral stated, "We have crossed the line into dangerous territory. I am embarrassed that the USA has a vice president for torture. I think it is just reprehensible. [Cheney] advocates torture, what else is it? I just don't understand how a man in that position can take such a stance." Turner said he does not believe repeated reports by President Bush that the US does not condone torture. Earlier this month, US senators affirmed their support [JURIST report] for an anti-torture amendment [JURIST document] sponsored by Sen. John McCain [official website], but the White House has threatened to veto the provision [JURIST report] if it is passed by the US House of Representatives. The UK Press Association has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ UN Security Council expansion plans likely dead
D. Wes Rist on November 18, 2005 11:40 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Friday's international brief, UN officials are now admitting that membership of the Security Council is unlikely to change anytime soon, despite months of negotiation and calls for changes [JURIST report] to the body's composition. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan supports expansion [JURIST report], and the US supports it in principle, but it opposed the plans put forth [JURIST report]. As a permanent member of the Security Council, a US veto would torpedo a proposal. Japan, Germany, Brazil, and India [JURIST report] were the primary players considered for addition, along with guaranteed spots for African nations and rotating positions. US ambassador to the UN John Bolton [official profile] predicted in October that expansion proposals would fail because the US supports only adding four or five new members, not 10 or more as the proposals suggested. Two days of speeches last week seemed to signal the loss of any momentum for the process, and Jan Eliasson, UN General Assembly president, said Thursday that he is only in "listening mode" on the issue. The New York Times has more.
In other international legal news ... - Indonesian officials on Friday dismissed a Dutch report [press release] released Wednesday that called the 1969 "Act of Free Choice" vote [Wikipedia backgrounder] in West Papua [advocacy website], in which just over 1,000 individuals selected by the Indonesian government decided that all of the then-700,000 populace would remain under Indonesian rule, a fraud and argued that Indonesia had violated international law and the UN Charter by absorbing West Papua as a province. The vote on self-determination was required as part of a 1962 agreement between the Netherlands, which had exercised colonial rule over the western half of New Guinea, and Indonesia, which claimed the territory as part of the de-colonization process. The UN Temporary Executive Authority was supposed to administer the island until 1969, when residents would be allowed to vote on their future political ties, but within a year, the UNTEA handed control of the territory over to Indonesia. Indonesian officials rejected the claims of the report, saying that the Netherlands and the international community had accepted the status of West Papua as a legitimate province of Indonesia. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Indonesia[JURIST news archive]. The Jakarta Post has local coverage.
- The UN-sponsored World Summit on the Information Society [official website], being held in Tunisia, has been the site of an informal debate between attending nations over the right of governments to limit freedom of the press and access to information. Officials from China and Senegal have taken a strong stand against the UN implementing any kind of official review of governments that block access to internet sites deemed 'seditious', arguing that state sovereignty allows independent nations to combat the 'negative impact' of the internet. China recently forced Yahoo News services [official website] to release the identity of a reporter [JURIST report] that published an article critical of the Chinese government. The head of international advocacy group Reporters Without Borders (RSF) [official website] Robert Menard was denied access to Tunisia [RSF report] in spite of being accredited to attend the summit because he faces criminal charges for incidents relating to the protest of the Tunisia tourist office in Paris in 2002. Menard has repeatedly called on the UN to take active steps to sanction the Tunisian government for limiting the access of its citizens to the internet. The Mail & Guardian Online has more.
- The Sri Lankan Department of Elections [official website] confirmed that ruling-party candidate Mahinda Rajapakse [official website, BBC profile] won Thursday's presidential election by receiving just over 50 percent of the national votes cast. Rajapakse has vowed to take a hard line on peace talks with rebel Tamil leaders and has stated that he intends to renegotiate the current ceasefire agreed to under former Sri Lankan president Chandrika Kumaratunga [official profile]. Rajapakse has also pledged to end attempts at privitization of national services in Sri Lanka [government website] and to initiate public agricultural subsidies. The election was touted as the most peaceful in Sri Lanka's independent history, as the Tamil Tigers [advocacy website] proclaimed no interest in the outcome of the election. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal agents arrest 120 on immigration violations after Wal-Mart raid
Holly Manges Jones on November 18, 2005 7:21 AM ET

[JURIST] Federal immigration officials Thursday raided a Wal-Mart [corporate website; JURIST news archive] distribution center construction site in Pennsylvania and arrested over 120 workers for immigration violations. Agents from the US Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [official website] worked with the US Department of Labor [official website], the US Social Security Administration [official website], Pennsylvania State Police, and the local sheriff's office to raid the site. Wal-Mart officials said they would cooperate with ICE and the Attorney General's office in the matter, but claimed that the arrested workers were employees of a subcontractor and that they require all their subcontractors to comply with federal, state and local laws. In 2003, a raid of 60 Wal-Mart stores in 21 states [JURIST report] revealed over 200 illegal workers and store executives claimed to have had no knowledge of the illegal aliens, saying that cleaning contractors hired them. An affidavit unsealed by ICE earlier this month, however, shows that two Wal-Mart executives knew [JURIST report] that the workers were being hired. Wal-Mart agreed to pay $11 million to settle [JURIST report] US DOJ allegations earlier this year. USA Today has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Patriot Act legislation stalls as six senators threaten to block reauthorization bill
Holly Manges Jones on November 18, 2005 7:00 AM ET

[JURIST] Legislation to reauthorize the USA Patriot Act [PDF text; JURIST news archive], many provisions of which are due to expire at the end of the year if not renewed, stalled Thursday as members of the bill's negotiating committee worked to appease some senators who are concerned about the removal of civil liberties protections. Senators on the committee have not yet agreed to the tentative House-Senate compromise [JURIST report] reached on Wednesday, since they are aware that six Republican and Democratic senators have threatened to block the USA Patriot Act and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005 [bill summary] when it reaches the Senate floor. The six senators voiced concerns that the compromise removed civil liberty protections that senators had previously agreed upon, including the removal of a Senate requirement that the government inform individuals about secret searches of their homes or businesses within seven to 30 days, and removal of a Senate proposal that would have mandated law enforcement authorities to come under judicial review for searches [JURIST report] of financial, medical, library, and schools. The US House of Representatives had hoped to approve the compromise Friday so Congress could adjourn for the Thanksgiving holiday, but the civil liberties concerns may push back the vote. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|