 |
|

Legal news from Monday, November 14, 2005 |
 |
|


Chirac promises to prosecute those responsible for riots
Joshua Pantesco on November 14, 2005 8:06 PM ET

[JURIST] French President Jacques Chirac [BBC profile] Monday delivered his first televised address [text, in French; translated excerpts] since a recent surge of violence began in France [JURIST news archive] nineteen days ago, promising that justice would be meted out to those responsible for the riots. "Those who make attacks against property and people must know that in a republic, they cannot violate the law without being arrested, prosecuted and sanctioned," he said, combining reassurances with a request for parliamentary approval of an extended three month state of emergency [JURIST report]. Some 2,700 people have been arrested since the beginning of the violence, and France is preparing to deport all foreign citizens charged with participating in the riots. The cities of Paris and Lyon banned public meetings [JURIST report] this past weekend after the central government authorized local authorities to exercise emergency powers [JURIST reports] to prevent further violence and property damage. Commentators suggest that the riots are fueled by larger racial and class-based tensions existent in France, symbolized by the debate last spring over the French government's banning [JURIST report] of religious dress [JURIST news archive], including Muslim head scarves [BBC report], in schools. Bloomberg has more. Le Monde has local coverage, in French.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Reagan-era documents give insight into Alito abortion views
Tom Henry on November 14, 2005 2:32 PM ET

[JURIST] A document [PDF text] released Monday by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library reveal that Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito [White House profile; US News profile] wrote in 1985 that he was proud of helping the government argue that "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion." Part of more than 100 pages on Alito [Reagan library documents; Bush library documents] released by the libraries Monday, the letter was related to Alito's attempt to secure the job of deputy assistant attorney general in 1985. He moved to the position in 1987. In the document Alito also wrote that he was "particularly proud of [his] contributions in recent cases in which the government argued that racial and ethnic quotas should not be allowed." Ralph Neas, head of the liberal People for the American Way [advocacy website; press release] said that the document "underscores our concern that he would vote to turn back the clock on decades of judicial precedent protecting privacy, equal opportunity, religious freedom, and so much more." Wendy Long, who works with the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network [advocacy website; press release] noted that Supreme Court Justices Ginsburg and Breyer had "taken clear public positions to the contrary, and no one argued that those positions should be held against them." AP has more.
In related news, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas [official profile, PDF] said Friday that "the only issue, the central issue in [federal court appointments], is abortion. It's not the other things that people throw out." He added that, "The whole judiciary now is being held, in a sense, hostage to that one issue." Speaking to law students at the University of Alabama, Thomas said the confirmation process should be less intrusive and not delve into every aspect of a nominee's life. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bosnian leaders fail to reach constitution agreement
Tom Henry on November 14, 2005 2:12 PM ET

[JURIST] At the close of a three-day meeting in Brussels Monday, the leaders of eight Bosnian political parties failed to reach an agreement on a new draft constitution [JURIST report] for the country. Representatives of the three main nationalities in Bosnia [government website; CIA backgrounder], Muslims, Serbs and Croats, agreed to disagree and to extend negotiations into next week, when they will resume talks in Washington. The goal of the new negotiations, sponsored by the European Union and the United States, is to simplify and stabilize the current constitution [text], which created one of the world's most ineffective and complex governments. American diplomat Donald Hayes, who chaired the Brussels meeting, said some progress has been made especially in the areas of elections and involvement in the EU. AKI has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules parents have burden of proof in special ed challenges
Brandon Smith on November 14, 2005 12:41 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] ruled Monday that parents who challenge special education programs for not meeting their children's needs must bear the burden of proving the programs' inadequacies, and not school officials. The case, Schaffer v. Weast [Duke Law backgrounder], is a loss for a Maryland family that challenged a special education program for their son who is afflicted with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Read the Court's majority opinion [text] by Justice O'Connor, along with a concurrence [text] from Justice Stevens, a dissent [text] from Justice Ginsburg and a second dissent [text] from Justice Breyer. AP has more.
Also on Monday, the Court granted certiorari in two cases. In Woodford v. Ngo, the Court is expected to clarify what steps prison inmates must take before they may file a federal lawsuit challenging prison conditions. In Beard v. Banks, the Court could reinstate rules that keep newspapers and magazines out of the hands of disruptive Pennsylvania inmates. The Court agreed to hear an appeal of a decision [PDF text] from the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit which upheld inmates' claims that the ban on most reading material and personal photographs violated their free speech rights. US Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito [JURIST news archive], who currently sits on the Third Circuit, wrote a dissent in the case. Read the Court's full Order List [PDF]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

French Cabinet approves February extension to emergency riot laws
Sara R. Parsowith on November 14, 2005 7:52 AM ET

[JURIST] The French Cabinet Monday approved an extension to emergency powers authorized earlier this month [JURIST report; press release, in French] in order to help quell riots [JURIST report] that started on October 27. Parliament is expected to approve the bill, deemed by French President Jacques Chirac [official profile] to be a "measure of protection and precaution." The bill was submitted in a special cabinet session to extend the emergency powers by three months from November 21 when the state of emergency is currently due to expire. On November 8, the country declared a state of emergency [PDF decree] under a 50-year-old law [JURIST document] which gives top local officials broad powers to impose curfews and restrictions as required in light of the surge of violence. Police said violence dropped after the 18th straight night of unrest [JURIST report] in the poorer suburbs of the Paris region and provincial cities, with youths setting fire to 284 vehicles compared to youths destroying 375 vehicles in petrol bomb attacks [Reuters report] the night earlier. The riots are thought to be a protest against racism, poor job prospects and the sense of exclusion felt by young French immigrant youths from North and West Africa in French society, and have been said to have been sparked off by the country's banning of religious dress [JURIST report]. France is expected to start deporting foreigners that are implicated in the violence according to a plan set out by Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy [official profile, in French], raising human rights concerns [JURIST report] and questions from other ministers. Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy [official profile, in French] said he agreed that illegal immigrants could be sent home, but not foreigners with permission to live in France, noting that "[a] French person who carried out a crime or a misdemeanor in France cannot be treated in one way while a foreigner with papers in order is treated in another." AP has more.
Previously in JURIST's Paper Chase...


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Death sentence, execution rates decline, DOJ report shows
Sara R. Parsowith on November 14, 2005 7:08 AM ET

[JURIST] Both the number of people sentenced to death and the number executed declined in 2004, according to US Justice Department statistics [PDF report; DOJ press release] released Sunday. According to the report, in 2004 a dozen states executed 59 prisoners, six less than in 2003 and 125 people convicted of murder received a death sentence, the smallest number since 1973. Report authors attributed the decline to a murder rate that is at its lowest level in 40 years. Advocacy groups also attribute the decline to habitual offender laws, which take potential capital murderers off the street, the decline in juror reluctance to award the death penalty in the face of media or legal investigations, the use of DNA evidence, and the increased use of life-without-parole sentences as an alternative to capital punishment. Out of 38 states with the death penalty, only New Mexico does not have a life-without-parole alternative. Texas recently enacted [JURIST report] Senate Bill 60 [text; JURIST report], which creates a life-without-parole sentencing option in state capital murder cases, and this option may have a significant effect in the state which in 2004 had three times as many death row inmates as other states. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|