 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, November 8, 2005 |
 |
|


Germany tries itinerant Holocaust denier
Lauren Becker on November 8, 2005 6:22 PM ET

[JURIST] A court in Mannheim has begun trial proceedings against neo-Nazi Ernst Zundel [ADL profile; CBC backgrounder], a German citizen charged in connection with denying the Holocaust in publications and a website [official website]. Holocaust denial constitutes a crime under Section 130 (3) of the German Federal Criminal Code, which provides: Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or renders harmless an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the type indicated in Section 220a subsection (1) [genocide], in a manner capable of disturbing the public piece shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine. Charges against Zundel include incitement, ethnic hatred, and disparaging the dead. Zundel denies the charges of fostering racial hatred and spreading Nazi propaganda based on his right to free speech. Zundel, now 66, left Germany for Canada in 1958, but after a unsuccessful bid to gain Canadian citizenship and a short stay in the United States he was deported from there earlier this year after being judged a national security threat. A Canadian court convicted him in 1988 of "spreading false news" in an anti-Holocaust tract, but the "false news" law was later overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada [judgment], which held it contrary to freedom of expression. Germany issued an international warrant for Zundel's arrest in 2003, and took him into custody immediately after he was returned by Canadian authorities in March 2005. The trial stalled shortly after it commenced Tuesday when the presiding judge threw one of Zundel's lawyers, Horst Mahlerout, out of court on grounds that he had been disbarred for racist sentiments; a verdict is nonetheless expected by November 24. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Environmental brief ~ EPA to propose lead-based paint regulations for home remodeling
Tom Henry on November 8, 2005 3:35 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Tuesday's environmental law news, the US Environmental Protection Agency [official website] has announced it will propose regulations for remodeling or renovating a home with lead-based paint by the end of the year. A federal law [text] had been passed in 1992 that requires contractors to disseminate information to homeowners [EPA factpage] before renovating certain properties, but the EPA has yet to adopt any corresponding regulations establishing the standards to be followed. AP has more.
In other environmental law news... - Judge David Bunning of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky [official website] heard a case Monday that sought an injunction against the US Army Corps of Engineers (CoE)[official website] from issuing permits that would allow mountaintop mining. Mountaintop mining [official backgrounder] pushes the tops of hills into an adjacent valley to expose coal veins. Opponents of the practice argue that streambeds and other waterways are often buried or otherwise adversely effected in the process. Last year, a federal district judge ruled [PDF text] that the CoE failed to comply with the federal Clean Water Act [PDF text] in approving valley fill permits in southern West Virginia. AP has more.
- Health Canada [official website], the Canadiam federal department of health, has banned the use of lead acetate in cosmetics, beginning in 2007. Products containing the compound include Grecian Formula 16 [corporate website], traditionally used by males to darken graying hair. Lead acetate has been banned from cosmetics in the European Union and the state of California, as a potential carcinogen. The US Food and Drug Administration [official website] has determined that there is no safety hazard with the compound when used as instructed and allows for its use in cosmetics, following certain labeling requirements [FDA backgrounder]. The Ottawa Citizen has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US military accused of illegally using chemical weapons against Iraqis
Greg Sampson on November 8, 2005 3:01 PM ET

[JURIST] Italian state TV RAI [media website] Tuesday aired a documentary accusing the United States of using the chemical white phosphorus [CDC factsheet; GlobalSecurity.org backgrounder] against both insurgents and civilians during a military assault on the insurgent-controlled city of Fallujah last year. Reports that US forces fired white phosphorous rounds into the city, causing severe burns, were circulated at the time [SF Chronicle report], and rights organizations expressed repeated concerns over alleged violations of international humanitarian law [JURIST report] during the siege. The US, however, denied the allegations [USINFO report] and said that US forces were "not using any illegal weapons in Fallujah or anywhere else in Iraq." Although there is currently no treaty specifically banning the use of white phosphorus, the 1980 Geneva Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons [text] bans the use of any incendiary weapons against civilian populations or in any area where high concentrations of civilians live. White phosphorus burns easily and is commonly used to illuminate nighttime battlefields; however, exposure to the chemical can cause substantial medical problems, including burns and irritation as well as organ damage. The US admits to using white phosphorus to illuminate some Iraqi battlefields, but denies using the chemical directly on individuals. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules for workers in pay dispute
Christopher G. Anderson on November 8, 2005 12:05 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled Tuesday in IBP Inc. v. Alvarez [Duke Law backgrounder] that meat packing companies must pay their workers for the time it takes to change into and out of protective clothing and other safety equipment, in addition to the time it takes the employees to walk to their work stations. In the unanimous opinion [PDF text], Justice Stevens wrote that both "donning and doffing" of safety gear and the time it takes workers to walk to the production areas are "integral and indispensable" to the employees' workweek, entitling workers to compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) [PDF text]. The Court also held, however, that under the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 [PDF text], which exempts certain activities from the FLSA, workers were not required to be compensated for time they spent waiting in line for equipment.
In a second unanimous opinion handed down Tuesday, the Court held in United States v. Olson [Duke Law backgrounder] that the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] ruled too broadly in allowing a lawsuit brought by two mineworkers against the US federal government. Justice Breyer wrote that, under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) [text], suits against the government were permitted only where local law would make a "private person" liable in tort, not where local law would make "a state or municipal entity" liable. The Ninth Circuit had held that because Arizona law would have allowed a suit against the federal government, the negligence lawsuit could proceed. Read the Court's opinion [PDF text]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US voters rule on redistricting, gay rights, other issues in off-year elections
Kate Heneroty on November 8, 2005 10:40 AM ET

[JURIST] Americans went to the polls Tuesday to cast ballots in off-year elections. Voters in New Jersey and Virginia are electing new governors [Reuters report], while 39 ballot measures are up for approval in seven states [Stateline.org report]: California, Maine, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Washington.
Voters in California and Ohio will determine how electoral districts should be redrawn. Californians will decide [SF Chronicle report] whether to remove redistricting power from legislators [JURIST report] and allocate it to a panel of three retired judges, and will also consider Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's initiatives to cap state spending. In Ohio, voters will decide on whether to create a State Board of Elections [Cleveland Plain Dealer coverage of ballot initiatives] to oversee operations currently handled by the Secretary of State. Ohioans are also considering whether to allow voters to cast their absentee ballots without stating a reason, and whether to rescind an increased campaign spending limit passed earlier in the year.
In Texas, voters are expected to approve a constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage [The Monitor election coverage], while voters in Maine are expected to ratify [Portland Press Herald coverage] a state law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment and housing. Washington voters have six ballot initiatives [Seattle Post-Intelligencer coverage] before them, including elimination of a 9.5-cents-per-gallon gasoline tax increase. USA Today has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China, Saudi Arabia cited by US for violating religious freedom
Kate Heneroty on November 8, 2005 9:55 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Department of State [website] on Tuesday is releasing its annual list of states considered to be serious violators of religious freedoms, opening the named states to potential sanctions. Officials say countries deemed to be "of particular concern" include China, Eritrea, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Vietnam. Uzbekistan [JURIST news archive; USCIRF press release] is notably said to be missing from the list, despite the recommendation of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) [commission website; annual recommendations, PDF], a congressionally-funded, bipartisan agency. An unnamed official said Uzbekistan was not included because "it would look too political," and the Bush Administration feared the appearance it was in retaliation for Uzbekistan's eviction of US troops from an air force base in the country. A 180-day waiver from sanctions was issued for Saudi Arabia by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in September because she wanted "to allow additional time for the continuation of discussions leading to progress on important religious freedom issues." Reuters has more. Though the 2005 list is not yet available online, the State Department has previous International Religious Freedom reports.
4:36 PM ET - The 2005 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom [index] is now available online, along with a fact sheet from the State Department.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|