Miers silent on abortion stance in meetings with Senate leaders Sara R. Parsowith at 7:09 AM ET
[JURIST] US Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers [JURIST news archive; Washington Postprofile] Tuesday will turn in her responses to a Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] questionnaire devised to reveal how she might rule on cases brought before the Supreme Court. In meetings with Senators following her nomination [JURIST report] to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Miers has revealed that she believes the Constitution contains a right to privacy, but she stopped short of divulging her personal views on the 1973 ruling that established abortion rights, Roe v. Wade [text]. Many conservatives view the case as the prime example of the Supreme Court creating a constitutional right that does not otherwise exist. AP has more.
10:53 AM ET - Materials submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday indicate that Miers supported a 1989 push for a constitutional amendment that would ban abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother. Miers' responses to Senate questions included a 1989 survey by Texans United for Life [advocacy website]. On that survey, Miers indicated that she would actively support ratification by the Texas Legislature of a "Human Life Amendment" to the US constitution. Miers also said she would oppose the use of public money for abortions and would use her influence to keep people with "pro-abortion" views off Texas health boards and commissions. AP has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.