 |
|

Legal news from Friday, September 2, 2005 |
 |
|


160 law professors sign letter opposing Roberts nomination
David Shucosky on September 2, 2005 11:30 AM ET

[JURIST] 160 US law professors have signed a letter [text] declaring their opposition to Supreme Court nominee John Roberts [JURIST news archive]. The group of professors expressed concern about Roberts' record, claiming he favors expansion of government power and reduction of individual rights: The record made available to date suggests that Judge Roberts holds a limited view of Congress' authority to enact key worker, civil rights and environmental protections and a similarly narrow view of the vital role our courts and our government play in safeguarding individual rights, especially civil and women's rights. In contrast, Judge Roberts holds an expansive view of presidential power and law enforcement authority. If transformed into decisional law, these views, taken together, could produce a government with little power to protect its citizenry and a citizenry with greatly reduced power to protect itself from the abuses of government and other powerful interests. In other words, they could produce a national order contrary to the promises of our Constitution and the rights it guarantees. The letter, distributed Thursday by Alliance for Justice [advocacy website], is addressed to Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Pat Leahy (D-VT), respectively chairman and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Also Thursday, Republican members of the Judiciary Committee disclosed their list of planned witnesses [AP report] for Roberts' confirmation hearings, scheduled to begin next week. The list of 15 witnesses includes two commissioners from the US Commission on Civil Rights, Jennifer Braceras [official profile] and Peter Kirsanow [official profile], and three conservative law school professors. Friday's Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Shiites hold rally in support of Iraqi constitution
Jeannie Shawl on September 2, 2005 8:41 AM ET

[JURIST] At least 5,000 Shiite Muslims held a rally Friday in the Southern Iraqi city of Basra, in a show of support for the draft Iraqi constitution [English translation; JURIST news archive]. Friday's rally follows smaller Sunni demonstrations [JURIST report] held earlier this week to protest against the constitution. The Shiite demonstration was organized by Iraq's two largest Shiite political groups, the Supreme Council of Islamic Revolution in Iraq and the Shiite Dawa Party, and was designed to garner support for the document which must be approved by voters in an October 15 referendum. Under Iraq's Transitional Administrative Law [text], a majority must vote in favor of the charter, but if two-thirds of voters in any three of Iraq's provinces reject the draft, the constitution will be defeated. AP has more.
10:45 AM ET - Iraq negotiators said Friday that discussions continue on the draft constitution, in an effort to gain Sunni Arab approval. Sunnis did not sign on to the agreement submitted to the Iraq parliament [JURIST report] last Sunday, citing concerns [JURIST document] on the charter's stance on federalism, de-Baathification and other sensitive issues. A Shiite negotiator said Friday that "Discussions are under way to make minor changes in the language to improve the text to satisfy some parties." Sunni negotiators and Western diplomats also confirm that there are ongoing talks, but did not elaborate on specifics. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|