New Mexico high court hears arguments in 2004 election case

[JURIST] The New Mexico Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments Monday in a lawsuit filed by 2004 presidential candidates David Cobb [Green Party official website] and Michael Badnarik [Libertarian Party official website]. Attorneys for Cobb and Badnarik argued that New Mexico election officials deliberately obstructed justice by giving counties permission to clear electronic voting machines while their demand for a recount of New Mexico's presidential vote was still pending. Also at issue is the $1.4 million security deposit required for the recount. Attorneys for the candidates contend that the state Canvassing Board [list of members] exceeded its power under state law by requiring a deposit in excess of $1 million. Attorneys for the board maintain that it properly handled the recount request, and all fees were proper. AP has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.