 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, August 10, 2005 |
 |
|


Corporations and securities brief ~ Federal court suspends SEC mutual fund rule
James Murdock on August 10, 2005 11:33 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Wednesday's corporation and securities law news, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has suspended controversial corporate governance rules for mutual funds promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The suspension will last until a lawsuit brought by the US Chamber of Commerce [advocacy website] and other groups challenging the new rules is resolved. The rules require that chairmen of mutual funds and 75 percent of the board of directors be independent. In June the court ruled [JURIST report] that the SEC had not considered the costs of implementing the change and ordered the SEC to reconsider the rules. In the last days of former SEC Chairman William Donaldson's tenure, he cast the deciding vote to reinstate the rule [JURIST report]. Bloomberg has more.
In other corporations and securities law news... - As previously reported today in JURIST's Paper Chase, Unocal [JURIST news archive] shareholders approved Chevron's planned $17.8 billion takeover [merger website] bid for the oil company. The shareholders voted 77% in favor of the sale. The Chevron bid of cash and stock was approved despite a previous $18.5 billion cash offer from Chinese state energy firm Cnooc [Wikipedia profile]. Cnooc withdrew its bid last week [JURIST report] because of intense political pressure, including a provision in the new energy bill that would have delayed any Chinese company for at least 120-days. Chevron and Unocal had originally agreed to the merger in principal in April [press release] before Cnooc attempted to buy Unocal. The difference in price equates to approximately $5 per share. Bloomberg has more.
- Two former Bayer AG [corporate website] executives were indicted Wednesday for their role in a price fixing scheme. Grand juries indicted Jurgen Ick and Gunter Monn for fixing prices on rubber chemicals from 1995-2001. Bayer pleaded guilty to related charges in 2004 [Bayer press release] and paid a $4.7 million fine. Ick and Monn, both of whom are German, face a maximum punishment of three years imprisonment and a $ 350,000 fine. One of their former associates, Martin Petersen, pleaded guilty to the same charges last year [DOJ press release] and was sentenced to four months in jail. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

States brief ~ CA Supreme Court to hold off review of gay marriage case
Rachel Felton on August 10, 2005 6:09 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Wednesday's states brief, the California Supreme Court [official website] held today without comment that it will not immediately review a March ruling [JURIST report] that declared the state ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. In that ruling, Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer wrote, "It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners." The appeal will now be heard by the 1st District Court of Appeal in San Francisco. Opponents of gay marriage are attempting to qualify a constitutional amendment [JURIST report] to ban gay marriage for next year's ballot. AP has more.
In other state legal news ... - The US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Wednesday upheld a Virginia law [text] requiring public schools to lead a daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. In the opinion [PDF text], Judge Karen Williams wrote, "Undoubtedly, the pledge contains a religious phrase, and it is demeaning to persons of any religions to assert that the words 'under God' contain no religious significance. The inclusion of those two words, however, does not alter the pledge as a patriotic activity." A father of three children had claimed the phrase "one nation under God" was an unconstitutional promotion of religion. AP has more.
- As reported earlier today in JURIST's Paper Chase, a California appeals court has refused [PDF text] to place Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's redistricting plan on the November ballot because the use of two different versions during the certification process was a "clear violation of the constitutional and statutory procedures for the circulation of an initiative petition." The court stated that "The proponents caused the problem in this case by their own negligence in circulating a different version of the initiative measure than that submitted to the attorney general." Proposition 77 [PDF text] seeks to remove the power to draw congressional and legislative boundaries from state lawmakers and to place that power with a panel of retired judges. California Attorney General Bill Lockyer [official website] said the ruling "is important for California voters because it protects the integrity of the initiative process." The decision, which will be appealed, affirmed a Superior Court ruling that removed the proposition from the ballot [JURIST report]. CNN has more.
- The Maryland Supreme Court has ruled [PDF text] that mortgage brokers who charge consumer fees for handling mortgage and refinance loans are subject to the state's Finder's Fee Law. The court found that the state law [text], which sets limits on such fees, was not preempted by federal law because mortgage brokers are outside the reach of the federal statute. The decision reversed a lower court ruling. The Baltimore Sun has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DHS Secretary says airline passenger privacy concerns overstated
David Shucosky on August 10, 2005 4:38 PM ET

[JURIST] US Department of Homeland Security [official website] Secretary Michael Chertoff has said that privacy concerns over the new Secure Flight passenger screening program [official website] are overstated. Speaking Tuesday with USA Today editors, he observed: The average American gives information up to get a CVS [drugstore discount] card that is far more in-depth than TSA's going to be looking at... Would you rather give up your address and date of birth to a secure database and not be pulled aside and questioned, or would you rather not give it up and have an increased likelihood that you're going to be called out of line and someone's going to do a secondary search of your bag? The DHS and TSA are looking to use the Secure Flight database as a replacement for CAPPS II [DHS factsheet], which was scrapped due to concerns - including some from the TSA itself - that is was too intrusive. The ACLU opposes Secure Flight [press release] as being ineffective, saying terrorists could easily foil the background checks it would require. Responding to Chertoff's comments, Timothy Sparapani, Legislative Counsel for the ACLU, said Wednesday:His comparison of CVS to airline security is way off the mark - retail stores cannot stop Americans from traveling, or falsely identify them as suspected terrorists. And, recent scandals show that our most private information stored in central databases is subject to security breaches and theft by hackers. USA Today has more, and offers an edited version of Chertoff's session with its editors.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Justice Department seeks dismissal of torture rendition suit on security grounds
David Shucosky on August 10, 2005 2:00 PM ET

[JURIST] Citing national security concerns, the US Justice Department has asked a federal district court to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a Canadian man who claims he was deported to Syria and tortured. Maher Arar [Wikipedia profile], born in Syria and a citizen of Canada as well, was detained at JFK Airport in New York City in September 2002 while changing planes during a vacation trip from Tunisia back home to Canada; he was held in solitary confinement in a Brooklyn detention center for a while and was then deported to Syria, a move which angered the Canadian government and rights groups. Arar claims that in Syria he was tortured into making false confessions of terrorist involvement; the Center for Constitutional Rights [case background] filed suit against the US government on his behalf in 2004. The Justice Department now wants the suit dismissed because they say it would force them to reveal classified information [PDF assertion of secrets privilege, motion opposing] that links Arar to al-Qaeda. Democracy Now has an interview with David Cole [text], the lead attorney on the case for CCR and Arar, discussing the implications of the government's motion: What we're saying in this lawsuit is that [renditions are] unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment. It is -- you cant beat people, nor can you send people to other countries to be beaten, and it's something that warrants judicial intervention. A number of Guantanamo detainees have made generally similar allegations [JURIST report] about the US sending terror suspects to foreign countries where they could be tortured. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|