 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, July 19, 2005 |
 |
|


BREAKING NEWS ~ Bush announces Roberts, says he will "apply laws strictly"
Bernard Hibbitts on July 19, 2005 9:15 PM ET

[JURIST] At a brief East Room ceremony, President Bush has formally announced his nomination of US DC Circuit Court of Appeals judge John Roberts to be an Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court [JURIST news archive]. Calling him one of the "most distinguished and talented attorneys in America", the President said Roberts was admired for his intellect, sound judgment, and sense of decency. Drawing attention to the 39 cases he had argued before the high court prior to going to the bench himself in 2003, Bush said that Roberts had earned the respect of members of both political parties, as evidenced by a bipartisan letter in support of his appeals court nomination.
Bush said his decision to nominate Roberts for the high court came after a "thorough process", and personal and staff consultations with over 70 members of the Senate. He said he had been "deeply impressed" by Roberts in his meetings with him, praising his "good heart", his experience, wisdom, fairness, and civility. The President said Roberts had "profound respect for the rule of law" and the liberties guaranteed to every American citizen. In a politically telling statement, he said Roberts would strictly apply the Constitution and laws, and not "legislate from the bench."
The President called for a "dignified confirmation process" conducted with fairness and civility and in a timely manner, and urged the Senate to act promptly on the nomination so that the newest justice could be on the bench at the start of the new Supreme Court term in October.
In brief comments of his own, Judge Roberts called his nomination humbling and emphasized his respect for the Supreme Court as an instituton; he said he looked forward to the confirmation process ahead.
10:17 PM ET - An official transcript of President Bush's remarks is now available from the White House, along with recorded video.
Previously in JURIST's Paper Chase:


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Bush picks appeals judge John Roberts for Supreme Court
Bernard Hibbitts on July 19, 2005 8:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Wire services are reporting that President Bush will nominate federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts for the US Supreme Court seat opened by the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, according to Washington sources. Roberts, a former law clerk to Chief Justice William Rehnquist, currently sits on the US DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which offers this official biographical sketch: Judge Roberts was confirmed by the Senate to a judgeship on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on May 8, 2003, and sworn in on June 2 by Chief Justice Rehnquist. Judge Roberts graduated from Harvard College in 1976, and received his law degree in 1979 from Harvard Law School. Following graduation from law school, he served as law clerk for Judge Henry J. Friendly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the following year to then-Associate Justice Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States. Judge Roberts served as Special Assistant to United States Attorney General William French Smith from 1981 to 1982 and Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan from 1982 to 1986. He then joined Hogan & Hartson where he developed a civil litigation practice, with an emphasis on appellate matters. From 1989 to 1993 he served as Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States. He returned to Hogan & Hartson in 1993. At the time of his confirmation, Judge Roberts was the senior partner in charge of Hogan & Hartson's appellate practice. He is a member of the American Law Institute and the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers. Legal Times provides a more in-depth profile. SCOTUSblog's Supreme Court nominations blog provides additional materials, including a brief review of notable opinions. The Harvard Crimson provides a look back at Roberts' days as a student at Harvard College and Harvard Law School.
Roberts' nomination to the DC Circuit was blocked for two years by Democrats before coming up for a vote in 2003. Prior to his confirmation, rights umbrella organization Alliance for Justice [advocacy website] issued a scathing report [PDF] on him, saying he had a record of hostility to the rights of women and minorities. He has also taken controversial positions in favor of weakening the separation of church and state and limiting the role of federal courts in protecting the environment....While working under Presidents Reagan and Bush, Mr. Roberts supported a hard-line, anti-civil rights policy that opposed affirmative action, would have made it nearly impossible for minorities to prove a violation of the Voting Rights Act and would have resegregated Americas public schools. He also took strongly anti-choice positions in two Supreme Court cases, one that severely restricted the ability of poor women to gain information about abortion services, and another that took away a key means for women and clinics to combat anti-abortion zealots. Roberts was opposed for his appeals court seat by a range of rights and women's groups, including Feminist Majority, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, NARAL Pro-Choice America [report on nominee, PDF], and the National Organization for Women [report on nominee]. The conservative Free Congress Foundation [advocacy website] offered a more favorable assessment of Roberts in 2001, soon after his initial nomination. After confirmation hearings on January 23 [transcript, PDF] and April 30 [transcript, PDF] 2003, his nomination was ultimately approved 14-3 by the Senate Judiciary Committee and cleared the Senate floor by consensus without a roll call vote; then-Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Orrin Hatch spoke in support of Roberts [Hatch transcript] at his January nomination hearing, and again in April [Hatch transcript].
The liberal People for the American Way [advocacy website] recently offered a report [PDF] on Roberts that includes an assessment of his appeals court performance since 2003, concluding thatRobertss record is a disturbing one. Among other things, is hostile to womens reproductive freedom, and he has taken positions in religious liberty and free speech cases that were detrimental to those fundamental rights. Roberts has limited judicial experience, but even his short tenure as a judge raises serious concerns about his ideology and judicial philosophy. For example, dissenting opinions by Roberts have questioned the constitutionality of the Endangered Species Act and argued that Americans tortured by Iraq when it was a terrorist state can receive no compensation. This preliminary review of Robertss record indicates that it falls far short of demonstrating the commitment to fundamental civil and constitutional rights that should be shown by a Supreme Court nominee. President Bush is expected to announce Judge Roberts as his nominee at the White House at 9 PM ET. More information will shortly be posted here on the White House website.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

States brief ~ MI elections board deadlocked on affirmative action amendment
Rachel Felton on July 19, 2005 4:31 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Tuesday's states brief, the Michigan Board of State Canvassers deadlocked today on a proposed constitutional amendment [text] that would prohibit the use of race and gender preferences in university admissions and government hiring. The board could not decide whether to accept or reject signatures gathered by the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative [website]. Michigan Civil Rights Initiative leaders said they will ask state courts to certify the signatures, while two canvassers said they will ask for an investigation into alleged claims of fraud and misrepresentation by MCRI in gathering the signatures. AP has more.
In other state legal news ... - The Connecticut Supreme Court has granted court-appointed attorneys for minor children absolute immunity from being sued by parents. In the opinion [PDF text], Justice David M. Borden wrote, "The threat of litigation from a disgruntled parent, unhappy with the position advocated by the attorney for the minor child in a custody action, would be likely not only to interfere with the independent decision-making required by this position, but may very well deter individuals from accepting appointment in the first place." In the decision, the Supreme Court applied the US Supreme Court's three-prong test to determine when a court-appointed attorney qualifies for absolute immunity and expanded the ruling of the appeals court [PDF text] which granted court-appointed attorneys for minors only qualified immunity. Connecticut's Hartford Courant has local coverage.
- Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly [official website] has rejected a proposed ballot initiative which aims to repeal the state's new embryonic stem-cell research law. Reilly found the law religious in nature and stated that the state constitution and caselaw say that any law relating distinctively to religion can not go before voters. The law [text], which was passed in May 2005 over the Governor's veto, promotes embryonic stem-cell research in the state, but allows medical staff with "sincerely held religious practices or beliefs" exemption from such research. The Boston Herald has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraq's neighbors join call for swift Saddam trial
Jamie Sterling on July 19, 2005 4:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Interior ministers from Iraq, Turkey, Iran, Syria, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Jordan joined Tuesday in calling for a swift start to the trial of Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive] after the Iraqi Special Tribunal [official website, JURIST news archive] filed its first charge [JURIST report] against the former Iraqi president on Sunday. A joint communique issued at the end of the meeting stressed the importance of "accelerating the process of bringing to justice in Iraq, Saddam Hussein and all those in the leadership of the previous Iraqi regime who have committed crimes against humanity." Meanwhile in Baghdad Iraqi President Jalal Talabani also urged a swift trial [AP report], arguing that a conviction could help reduce insurgent attacks significantly, once the insurgents realize Saddam will not be coming back to power. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ UN peacekeepers found guilty of sexual abuse in Burundi
D. Wes Rist on July 19, 2005 1:58 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Tuesday's international brief, UN spokesman Penangnini Toure has announced that two UN peacekeepers serving in the UN Mission to Burundi [official website] peacekeeping force were found guilty of breaking the UN's new, strict code governing sexual conduct of peacekeeping personnel while on assignment. Toure said that the two men were found guilty of paying for sex with individuals under the age of 18, automatically making them minors and thus violating the UN peacekeeping sexual conduct code. Toure said both men had been repatriated to their home country, but refused to specify which country the men had originated from. Earlier, unconformed reports had identified the men as Ethiopian. The UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations [official website] has been under close scrutiny since six peacekeepers were found guilty of sexually abusing underage girls [JURIST report] in the Congo earlier this year. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of the United Nations [JURIST news archive]. BBC News has more.
In other international legal news ... - The Ugandan Parliament [government website] has voted to withdraw a provision from the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2005 that would have given the Ugandan government [official website] the power to create special courts for terrorist offenses. Ugandan Minister of State for Justice and Constitution Affairs, Adolf Mwesige argued that terrorism was an ongoing problem that required special courts to deal with offenders, especially in light of Uganda's recent passage of the Anti-Terrorism Act. The Committee on Legal and Parliamentary Affairs [official website] recommended to Parliament that the clause be removed, as Uganda's current laws were sufficient to deal with any attempted terrorism in the nation. Uganda's Monitor has local coverage.
- Indonesian State Secretary Yusril Ihza Mahendra has announced that the Indonesian government [official website] would not amend Law No. 31/2002 on the establishment of political parties in order to meet the terms of the recent peace agreement [JURIST report] between the Free Aceh Movement [Wikipedia profile] and the government. Instead, the Law on Special Autonomy for Aceh has been presented as capable of being amended to allow for the creation of a local political party, one of the key demands of the rebel party. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Indonesia [JURIST news archive]. The Jakarta Post has local coverage.
- Nepalese Minister of General Administration Krishna Lal Thakali, appointed by King Gyanedra [official profile] following the abolition of the elected Nepalese government [JURIST report] on Febraury 1, has announced that Nepal's Civil Service Act was amended at the Gyanedra's direction to disallow the formation of unions by civil servants in Nepal. Thakali said that certain key unions would be granted special privilege to operate, but did not specify which unions would receive royal privilege. Union leaders and civil rights groups have roundly condemned the amendment as an unfair restriction on the rights of Nepalese citizens working for the government, and asserted that the decision ran afoul of Nepal Supreme Court [official website] decisions and treaties ascribed to by Nepal through the United Nations and the International Labour Organization [official website. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Nepal [JURIST news archive]. Nepal News has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Falwell cleared of FEC charges
Krista-Ann Staley on July 19, 2005 11:34 AM ET

[JURIST] According to the attorney for Rev. Jerry Falwell [official website], the Federal Election Commission (FEC) [official website] on Monday dismissed a Campaign Legal Center [official website] complaint [PDF text] against the evangelist in a 6-0 decision. According to the Campaign Legal Center, Jerry Falwell and two associated, tax-exempt nonprofit organizations broke election laws when they stated that, "voting for principle this year means voting for the re-election of George W. Bush. The alternative, in my mind, is simply unthinkable," in an internet newsletter July 1, 2004. The complaint also alleged that the organizations solicited funds for the Campaign for Working Families, a federal political action committee (PAC), on their website. Federal law prohibits corporations from making political communications to, or raising PAC funds from, the general public. A similar complaint lodged with the IRS [PDF text], stating the activities violated tax code section 501(c)(3) [text] is pending. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

African Union submits UN Security Council expansion plan
David Shucosky on July 19, 2005 10:52 AM ET

[JURIST] The African Union [official website] introduced its own plan for expansion of the UN Security Council on Monday, despite ongoing negotiations that would give Africa permanent representation on the council [JURIST report] and opposition by the US, Russia, and China [JURIST report] to the so-called G-4 plan. This plan, proposed by Germany, Japan, Brazil, and India would put 10 new nations on the council, including two African nations. Six of the ten would be permanent members, but none of them would have veto powers. The new African proposal calls for 11 new members, with six permanent members having veto power. The US supports expansion in principle [US General Assembly address] but has not yet given approval to any plan submitted. It's not clear if the African proposal will receive a vote, and the G-4 plan seems likely to fail [AP report]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|