Fox hunters mount constitutional challenge in British high court

[JURIST] The pro-hunting Countryside Alliance [advocacy website] Wednesday challenged Britain's recent ban on fox hunting with dogs [JURIST report] in the House of Lords Wednesday by questioning the Parliament Act [Wikipedia backgrounder' UK Parliament research paper], the law that allowed the lower house of parliament, the House of Commons, to pass the legislation over the objection of the upper chamber. "The challenge to the Parliament Act is not about hunting - it's about the constitutional arrangements of our country and respect for the law,'' said Countryside Alliance Chief Executive Simon Hart. If overturned, the ruling could affect other cases involving statutes passed under the Parliament Act, including legislation equalizing the age of consent between heterosexuals and homosexuals and the War Crimes Act in 1991, which extended the jurisdiction of British courts to acts committed on behalf of Nazi Germany during WWII. Read the Countryside Alliance press release on their House of Lords arguments. Bloomberg has more.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.