 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, May 25, 2005 |
 |
|


Hong Kong passes election law change, acting executive resigns to campaign
Alexandria Samuel on May 25, 2005 7:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Hong Kong acting Chief Executive Donald Tsang [BBC profile] tendered his resignation Wednesday, shortly after the Legislative Council [official website, English] passed a controversial amendment to the Chief Executive Election Ordinance that will cut short the term of the next chief executive. Tsang's resignation will allow him to campaign for the July election to replace Hong Kong's former leader, Tung Chee-hwa, who abruptly resigned [JURIST report] in March. Tung's resignation led to a dispute over the length of the term to be served by his successor, and Chinese government officials decided that the winner of July's election would only serve two years, the remainder of Tung's term. Pro-democracy groups argued that the law clearly allowed Tung's elected replacement to serve a full five-year term. Hong Kong officials asked China's National People's Congress [official website] for an interpretation of Hong Kong's Basic Law [text, English]; the NPC endorsed a limited term [JURIST report] and asked Hong Kong's legislature to clarify the election ordinance by passing an amendment saying that if a chief executive resigned, the next elected leader would serve out the rest of the term. Read the Hong Kong goverment press release on Tsang's resignation. AP has more. Hong Kong's Standard has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Amnesty report accuses US of violating torture ban
Kate Heneroty on May 25, 2005 10:34 AM ET

[JURIST] Amnesty International Wednesday released [press release] its 2005 Report [overview], condemning governments for failing to show principled leadership, betraying promises on human rights, failing to confront their lack of success with fighting terrorism, and persisting with failed but politically convenient strategies. The report says US policies which came to light after the Abu Ghraib [JURIST news archive] prisoner abuse allegations, "dilute the absolute ban on torture". According to the summary of Amnesty's findings on the US: Photographic evidence of the torture and ill-treatment of detainees in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq by US soldiers became public in late April, causing widespread national and international concern. President Bush and other officials immediately asserted that the problem was restricted to Abu Ghraib and a few wayward soldiers.
On 22 June, after the leaking of earlier government documents relating to the "war on terror" suggesting that torture and ill-treatment had been envisaged, the administration took the step of declassifying selected documents to "set the record straight". However, the released documents showed that the administration had sanctioned interrogation techniques that violated the UN Convention against Torture and that the President had stated in a central policy memorandum dated 7 February 2002 that, although the USA's values "call for us to treat detainees humanely", there are some "who are not legally entitled to such treatment". The documents discussed, among other things, ways in which US agents could avoid the international prohibition on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, including by arguing that the President could override international and national laws prohibiting such treatment.... The report also criticizes President Bush's failure to apply the Geneva Conventions to those captured in Afghanistan and transferred to Guantanamo Bay, and calls for the closure of the base, describing it as "the gulag of our time." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House votes on stem cells despite presidential veto threat
Kate Heneroty on May 25, 2005 8:15 AM ET

[JURIST] The US House voted 238-194 Tuesday to loosen restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research and the legislation now goes to the Senate, where it has strong bi-partisan support. However, President Bush has promised [Washington Post report] to veto the bill. Under the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act [bill summary], the federal government could fund research involving embryonic stem cells donated from fertility clinics, regardless of when they were created. Although the majority fell far short of the two-thirds needed to override a veto, sponsors of the legislation, Reps. Michael N. Castle (R-Del.) [Castle's stem cell website] and Dianna DeGette (D-Colo.) [official website] hope the vote will convince the President that a compromise is needed. A recent Gallup poll found that 60 percent of Americans find stem cell research morally acceptable. In a separate vote Tuesday, the House also approved 431-1 the Stem Cell Therapeutic Research Act [text], to provide $79 million in federal funds to collect stem cells from umbilical cord blood, facilitate medical research on therapeutic uses, and set up a national registry to help patients find matches. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|