JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Monday, April 04, 2005

Supreme Court rules IRAs exempt from bankruptcy estate, creditors' claims
Liza Hall at 11:20 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court Monday unanimously ruled in Rousey v. Jacoway [case backgrounder from Duke Law School] that Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) can be exempted from a bankruptcy estate, allowing bankruptcy filers to retain their IRAs rather than forcing them to divide the assets among their creditors. The Rouseys claimed an exemption but their bankruptcy trustee objected, arguing that 11 U.S.C. s. 522(d)(10)(E) grants exemptions for annuities, stock options and other such plans only if the payments are made “on account of illness, disability, death, age or length of service”; this, the trustee argued, excluded IRAs from shelter because such funds can be accessed at any time if holder is willing to pay the associated taxes and penalties. The Supreme Court disagreed in an opinion [PDF] by Justice Thomas, reversing the Eighth Circuit opinion [PDF] and resolving a three-way circuit split.

Also Monday, the Court resolved a circuit split on a timing question under federal habeas law in a 5-4 opinion [PDF] written by Justice Souter in Johnson v. United States [case backgrounder from Duke Law School]. The Court ruled that where a prisoner challenges a federal sentence on the grounds that a state conviction used to enhance it was vacated, the one-year filing deadline for habeas under 28 U.S.C. 2255 begins to run when the prisoner receives notice that the prior conviction has been vacated. In a dissent [PDF] Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Stevens, Scalia and Ginsburg, disagreed with the Court's parallel finding that the prisoner must use due diligence to obtain the vacatur in the first place or else risk having his enhanced sentence maintained despite the vacatur.

Finally on Monday, the Court granted certiorari in Central Virginia Community College, et al., v. Katz, raising a state imunity issue under the Eleventh Amendment in connection with a bankruptcy court's discharge of an unpaid student loan. Review the Court's full Order List [PDF].






Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Hungary prosecutors charge accused Nazi with war crimes
1:19 PM ET, June 18

 ICC grants Kenya VP's request to skip parts of upcoming trial
12:23 PM ET, June 18

 Libya senior judge assassinated outside courthouse
9:29 AM ET, June 18

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org