Supreme Court rules in Massachusetts double-jeopardy case

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] issued opinions in two cases Tuesday. In the first, Smith v. Massachusetts, the Court ruled that a trial judge's reversal of a mid-trial ruling to dismiss a firearm charge constituted double jeopardy. Justice Scalia wrote the opinion [text, PDF] in the 5-4 decision, with Justice Ginsburg authoring the dissent. According to the Court, although states may adopt procedures to reconsider mid-trial determinations on the sufficiency of evidence, Massachusetts did not have one at the time, and the judge's ruling violated the Double Jeopardy Clause as a result.

The Court also issued an opinion in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co., in which it held that a dredge qualifies as a "vessel" under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act [text], for purposes of seeking personal injury compensation under the Jones Act. The unanimous opinion [text, PDF] in the case was authored by Justice Thomas.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.