 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, January 4, 2005 |
 |
|


Indonesia moves to preempt child trafficking after tsunami as UNICEF issues exploitation warning
Bernard Hibbitts on January 4, 2005 8:13 PM ET

[JURIST] The government of Indonesia, concerned over reports of human trafficking in children in the wake of last week's tsunami disaster off the west coast of the country that killed over 100,000 and left other hundreds of thousands homeless, has now placed restrictions on the transport of youngsters out of the country and has brought special guards into refugee camps, directing local police commanders to be on watch against abduction or other exploitation of children. The move comes as senior UN officials with UNICEF warn that the chaotic situation with so many children suddenly left without parents has created an environment where exploitation and trafficking is likely to occur, with criminal elements attracted to camps, hospitals and other locations where children may be vulnerable. According to a UNICEF statement issued in Jakarta Tuesday, relief efforts must ensure that children are protected from exploitation. In tumultuous environments like those in the tsunami zone where families are broken apart, incomes are lost, and hope is in short supply children are more vulnerable.... In some of the affected countries, reports have been emerging of opportunistic child traffickers moving in to exploit vulnerable children. UNICEF is working closely with local and national authorities to head off these criminal activities. UNICEF executive diretor Carol Ballamy says, however, that as yet she has no concrete information on any actual trafficking, and officials with other aid agencies have called reports of child trafficking in other affected locations such as Sri Lanka "fairly unsubstantiated." At the same time, Thai authorities and INTERPOL are investigating the disappearance from hospital of a 12-year old Swedish boy who was taken by a man who was not his father. Read the UNICEF statement here. The UK Press Association has more; AP offers this report.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former retail chain CEO indicted on perjury charges
Bernard Hibbitts on January 4, 2005 2:56 PM ET

[JURIST] New York state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer announced Tuesday that a grand jury has indicted former Federated Department Stores Inc. chairman James Zimmerman for perjury, claiming he lied to antitrust investigators about a plan to keep upscale tableware out of Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. stores. According to a statement from Spitzer's office: Zimmerman intentionally offered false testimony in a sworn statement on April 9, 2004. Specifically, Zimmerman was asked whether he had called Sir Anthony O'Reilly, the Chairman of the Board of Waterford, Wedgewood, PLC, to dissuade him from selling Waterford products through Bed Bath & Beyond or to otherwise encourage him to pull out of the negotiations to do so. Zimmerman repeatedly told the assistant attorney general taking the deposition that he had never discussed Bed Bath & Beyond in any way with anyone at Waterford, including O'Reilly. According to the indictment, Zimmerman knew that these denials were untrue.
In 2004 the Federated chain paid a $900,000 civil penalty in settlement of claims that it had conspired with the May Department store and the Lenox and Waterford Wedgewood china makers to restrict competition by keeping Lenox and Waterford products out of the Bed Bath chain. Read the Spitzer press release here. The full text of the grand jurisy indictment of Zimmerman is here [PDF[. Bloomberg has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

No White House torture memos for Gonzales confirmation hearing
Kate Heneroty on January 4, 2005 10:35 AM ET

[JURIST] Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales seems likely to face stiff questioning in his Senate confirmation hearing this week after the Bush administration's refusal to provide senators with copies of his memos on the interrogation of suspected terrorists. Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, the Senate's second-ranking Democrat, sharply criticized the White House move Monday, complaining that "We go into the hearing with some knowledge of what has occurred because of press reports or leaks but without the hard evidence that will either exonerate or implicate Judge Gonzales in this policy." While he was White House Counsel, Gonzales wrote a draft memorandum [PDF] to the President which was later made public arguing that the "war on terrorism renders obsolete the Geneva Convention's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners..." The White House and the US Justice Department have since backed away from these views. Largely on the basis on Gonzales' apparent views on torture, detentions and other rights and liberties matters his nomination has drawn the ire of rights groups (see, for instance, this report by the ACLU issued Monday, with accompnaying press release), but most observers believe it unlikely that it will fail. AP has more.
12:55 PM ET - In a related development Tuesday, a dozen retired generals and admirals - including former Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General John M. Shalikashvili - said in a letter released at a news conference called by Human Rights First (formerly the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights) that they were "deeply concerned" about the Gonzales nomination and urged Senators to question him closely about his knowledge of and views on torture by US personnel: During his tenure as White House Counsel, Mr. Gonzales appears to have played a significant role in shaping U.S. detention and interrogation operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, and elsewhere. Today, it is clear that these operations have fostered greater animosity toward the United States, undermined our intelligence gathering efforts, and added to the risks facing our troops serving around the world. Before Mr. Gonzales assumes the position of Attorney General, it is critical to understand whether he intends to adhere to the positions he adopted as White House Counsel, or chart a revised course more consistent with fulfilling our nations complex security interests, and maintaining a military that operates within the rule of law. Read the full text of the letter here [PDF], along with an accompanying press release. An HRI briefing paper for the Gonzales nomination hearing is here. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

British Freedom of Information Act takes effect
Kate Heneroty on January 4, 2005 9:02 AM ET

[JURIST] Britain's Freedom of Information Act took substantive effect Monday on the first UK workday of the new year, 4 years after its passage by Parliament. Under the Act, any recorded governmental information, including paper records, e-mails, computer records, audio, video, microfiche, and handwritten notes can be requested by the public and the appropriate governmental department must respond within 20 days. Critics complain about broad exceptions which may prevent the release of highly sought-after documents, such as those detailing the Attorney General's advice to Prime Minister Tony Blair on the Iraq war. A request can be denied if finding the information costs more than £s;450 or 2.5 days of work, or if disclosure would prejudice international relations, law enforcement, commercial interests the economy, or inhibit official discussions. The UK Department for Constitutional Affairs provides instructions for making a request. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|