 |
|

Legal news from Monday, October 25, 2004 |
 |
|


Gross violations of human rights continuing in Afghanistan: UN
Tom Henry on October 25, 2004 9:05 PM ET

"Gross violations of fundamental human rights" are continuing in post-Taliban Afghanistan, according to the report [PDF] of an independent expert appointed by UN Secretary-General Annan. The report, submitted by M. Cherif Bassiouni, details extrajudicial executions to inhuman detention to the frequent abuse or assault of women and girls, and is based on meetings with a variety of government officials (Afghan and foreign ministers), human rights agencies, NGOs, individual human rights activists, and an 8 day trip to Afghanistan in mid August. Bassiouni's recommendations for ameliorating the situation include increasing the number of foreign troops in the country, reducing opium and child trafficking, developing a system of land titling, and prohibiting warlords and drug lords from assuming public office. The UN has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Violent crime down 25 percent from decade ago
Tom Henry on October 25, 2004 8:15 PM ET

Violent crime in the United States is down 25 percent from a decade ago, according to the FBI annual uniform crimes report released Monday. Read the full text of Crime in the United States, 2003 [PDF]. The report, compiled from data submitted by over 17,000 law enforcement agencies representing 93% of the US population, tracks violent and property crime in the US. Violent crime, consisting of murder, non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, was down 3 percent in volume from 2002 and 25.6 percent compared to 1994. Property crime, comprised of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft, was down 0.2 percent in volume from 2002 and 14 percent compared to 1994. The FBI press release is here. At the Department of Justice, Attorney General John Ashcroft welcomed the new statistics with this statement.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Corporations and securities brief ~ Citigroup settles hedge fund probe; apologizes for conduct in Japan
Amit Patel on October 25, 2004 5:49 PM ET

In Monday's corporations and securities law news, the NASD has announced that Citigroup has agreed to pay $250,000 to settle allegations of using misleading sales material on hedge funds. Tomorrow the SEC is expected to announce new oversight for hedge funds. Read the NASD press release here. AP has more. Citigroup also issued an apology Monday for breakdown of its corporate governance, compliance and internal control systems related to its private banking business in Japan. The group announced a wide-ranging plan to regain the trust of financial regulators and the public. Read more about the plan here [PDF]. The Financial Times has more.
In other news, in what will become the world's largest steel company, Laksmi Mittal, the Indian entrepreneur, announced the merger of his existing assets in Ispat and LNM with US-based International Steel Group. The deal worth $17 billion will create a new company known as Mittal Steel. Read the Mittal press release here [PDF]. The company also had a webcast which can be viewed here. The Financial Times has more.... The SEC, in its financial-services industry conflicts probe, is finding indications that mutual fund companies paid retirement-plan consultants for a recommendation to the consultants' clients. Dow Jones has more.... As previously reported on JURIST's Paper Chase, antitrust regulators in the Justice Department have approved the proposed acquisition of AT&T Wireless Services Inc. by Cingular Wireless LLC. AP has more. Read Cingular's press release announcing the deal here and more information on the new company. Read the Department of Justice press release here.... The Army Corps of Engineers' top contracting official has demanded an investigation into a Halliburton Co. subsidiary which the official claims unfairly won no-bid contracts worth billions of dollars for support services in Iraq and the Balkans. Reuters has more.... Marsh & McLennan Cos. Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Greenberg resigned only eleven days after New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's complaint [PDF] against the company was announced. Greenberg is being replaced by Michael Cherkasky, formerly of Kroll Inc. Read the Marsh press release here. Bloomberg has more.... As previously reported on JURIST's Paper Chase, the EU announced today that it would suspend sanctions on US imports after President Bush signed a tax reform bill last week which ended illegal export subsidies. Reuters has more. click for previous corporations and securities law news


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ohio GOP drops thousands of voter registration challenges after computer glitch found
Amit Patel on October 25, 2004 4:01 PM ET

Ohio Republicans, who on Friday had filed 35,000 voter registration challenges in 65 of Ohio's 88 counties (see previous report on JURIST's Paper Chase), today withdrew thousands of those challenges. The withdrawal came after they discovered errors in their filings apparently caused by a computer glitch. The party had already withdrawn about 7,500 challenges over the weekend because the names and addresses on the GOP list did not match voter rolls. However, the largest batch of challenges, 17,000 in Cleveland's Cuyahoga County, were found to have had no errors and are still being processed. According to an election director in Hamilton County, a new challenge cannot be mounted because it is too late under the governing statute. Read more about the Ohio Republican party's voter fraud initiative here. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Georgia Supreme Court overturns hate crimes law
Jeannie Shawl on October 25, 2004 11:21 AM ET

The Georgia Supreme Court unanimously overturned the state's hate crimes law Monday, calling it "unconstitutionally vague." Georgia's statute requires stiffer penalties when a defendant selects a victim because of bias or prejudice. In its opinion, the court wrote: We recognize that persons of ordinary intelligence may understand the dictionary definition of the words "bias" and "prejudice." However, because of the broad signification of these words and the absence of any specific context in which a person's bias or prejudice may apply in order to narrow the construction of these concepts, we find that OCGA § 17-10-17 fails to provide fair warning of the conduct it prohibits. Unlike the statute addressed in Mitchell, supra, which singled out for enhancement specific bias-inspired conduct "thought to inflict greater individual and societal harm" based on the perceived harm that results from crimes motivated by these prejudices, e.g., the greater likelihood that bias-motivated crimes will "provoke retaliatory crimes, inflict distinct emotional harms on their victims, and incite community unrest," id., 508 U.S. at 487-488, the broad language in OCGA § 17-10-17, by enhancing all offenses where the victim or his property was selected because of any bias or prejudice, encompasses every possible partiality or preference. A rabid sports fan convicted of uttering terroristic threats to a victim selected for wearing a competing team's baseball cap; a campaign worker convicted of trespassing for defacing a political opponent's yard signs; a performance car fanatic convicted of stealing a Ferrari -- any "bias or prejudice" for or against the selected victim or property, no matter how obscure, whimsical or unrelated to the victim it may be, but for which proof beyond a reasonable doubt might exist, can serve to enhance a sentence. Absent some qualification on "bias or prejudice," OCGA § 17-10-17 is left "'so vague that persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.'" Payne v. State, 275 Ga. 181, 183 (563 SE2d 844) (2002). Accordingly, we hold that OCGA § 17-10-17 is too vague to justify the imposition of enhanced criminal punishment for its violation. Read the full opinion [PDF] or a summary of the opinion. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ New Darfur peace talks begin
D. Wes Rist on October 25, 2004 10:35 AM ET

The African Union-hosted peace talks on the humanitarian crisis in Darfur began Monday in the Nigerian capital city of Abuja. This is the second round of talks hosted by the AU; the first round ended in September with no agreement being reached concerning the crisis. The talks were slated to begin last Thursday, but delays in the travel arrangements of delegates caused the talks to be pushed back. Negotiators include the offical government representative of the Sudan, as well as representatives from the major rebel groups currently engaged in combat in the Darfur region. Each side has accused the other of breaking a cease-fire agreement reached in April of 2004. JURIST's Paper Chase has background on the legal issues in the Darfur crisis. The Sudan Tribune has more.... European Union ministers announced Monday that they have reached a common agreement on an asylum policy for the EU. The regional organization had been struggling with different opinions on the way to best address the influx of refugees and illegal immigrants to the relatively safe EU states. The dispute was highlighted by the actions taken by Italy recently in shipping thousands of refugees off of the island of Lampedusa and back to Libya in North Africa (JURIST's Paper Chase has background). The approved plan, known as the Hague Programme, is slated for formal adoption at an EU summit in November; it sets common guidelines for admission and deportation policies, and creates an equal distribution framework for refugees granted admittance to the EU. The proposals of the plan are subject to a majority vote, meaning no single member may veto the provision. BBC News has more.... The International Atomic Energy Agency has announced that it will present evidence to the UN Security Council Monday of nearly 380 tons of high yield explosives that went missing from an IAEA secured site near Baghdad. The explosives can be used for high yield conventional bombs, or for triggering the implosion needed to create a nuclear bomb. The IAEA claims that it has been unable to monitor the explosives, stored at the al-Qaqaa complex near Baghdad, due to the security restrictions put in place by the US military. JURIST's Paper Chase has background in IAEA concerns. CNN has more.... Iran announced Sunday that it has rejected a plan presented by Britain, Germany, and France to supply Iran with the nuclear fuel necessary to run nuclear power plants in order to avoid Iran developing the capability of producing its own nuclear fuel. The IAEA and the European Union have expressed concern that Iran's nuclear fuel program might be used to create material that could be used in creating a nuclear weapon. Iran has protested the intrusion into its internal affairs, saying that it has an 'international right to develop a domestic source of nuclear fuel.' In a meeting with Iran's Expediency Council Chairman Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, South African Ambassador to Iran Yusuf Saloojee said that the IAEA should close its case file on Iran 'and thus solve the problem.' The Tehran Times has more on the meeting. The Guardian has more on Iran's official statement.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|