 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, October 10, 2004 |
 |
|


Russia opposes referring Iran to IAEA
Bernard Hibbitts on October 10, 2004 6:07 PM ET

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov [official profile], in Tehran to discuss an $800 million deal [Aljazeera report] to build a nuclear power plant in southern Iran in 2006, has told a press conference that US efforts to refer Iran to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [official website] over its nuclear program are "premature and ... counter-productive." The IAEA has imposed a November 25 deadline for Iran to cease all uranium-enrichment activities, and Lavrov stated that he "will be expecting the cooperation between Iran and the IAEA to continue." However, his Iranian counterpart Kamal Kharazi [backgrounder], also at the press conference, told reporters: It is Iran's legitimate right to master nuclear technology including uranium enrichment. There is no talk of stopping it. It's not something Iran can accept. However, Iran is open to any proposal or mechanism to ensure that it won't go towards nuclear weapons. Along with the US, Britain, France and Germany would like Iran to abandon nuclear fuel cycle work, which can be used for atomic energy or nuclear weapons. Fuel cycle work for peaceful purposes is permitted under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) [summary], of which Iran is a signatory, and Iran insists it simply wants to use nuclear power to meet growing domestic energy demands and free up its vast oil and gas resources for export. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

German high court: headscarf ban applies to Christian nuns
Liza Hall on October 10, 2004 3:50 PM ET

Germany's highest administrative court has ruled that the Baden-Wurttemberg [official website] region's ban on Muslim teachers wearing headscarves also requires Christian nuns, who teach extensively in the predominantly Catholic region, to remove their habits before entering the classroom. The full text from the Federal Administrative Court [official website] ruling is not yet available, but BBC News, citing an advance copy of tomorrow's Der Spiegel, quotes it as saying that "exceptions for certain forms of religiously motivated clothing in certain regions are out of the question."
Headscarves have been the topic of fierce debate in Germany since teacher Fereshta Ludin [Pluralism Project backgrounder] filed suit after being denied a job in Stuttgart in 1998. Ludin argued that the German constitution guaranteed her right to wear the headscarf. The federal Constitutional Court [official website] ruled in September 2003 that under then-current laws, she was correct, but it also noted that individual states could pass laws banning the headwear. In April 2004, Baden-Wurttemberg's parliament [official website] passed a ban almost unanimously. Law professor Ferdinand Kirchhof [official website, in German], author of the legislation, said the nuns' habits were "professional uniforms" and so not subject to the ban.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Candidates withdraw Afghan vote boycott
Kate Heneroty on October 10, 2004 10:30 AM ET

Several opposition candidates in Afghanistan's presidential election who had previously called for a boycott of the election results have softened their position. Rather than supporting a new election as was called for on Saturday, they are now requesting an investigation into irregularities and fraud. The main source of the fraud allegations stem from the ink used to mark voters fingers after casting a ballot. The ink, which should not have washed off, was easily removed, raising concerns that multiple votes could be cast by the same person. The independent Free and Fair Elections Foundation of Afghanistan (FEFA), which monitored the polling stations, said in a statement that the elections were "fairly democratic" and security was "better than expected." Observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) also issued a statement Sunday saying that Based on reports from our own teams as well as information provided by the European Union election experts, domestic monitors and delegations from a number of countries, we concur with the Joint Election Management Body that the candidates' demand to nullify the election is unjustified. Such action would also put into question the expressed will of millions of Afghan citizens who came out to vote, carried out voter registration and manned the polling stations despite great personal risk. Read their full statement here. The UN has described voter turnout in the elections as "massive." BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|