Two new US Supreme Court rulings Bernard Hibbitts at 12:28 PM ET
[JURIST] The United States Supreme Court [official website] handed down two decisions Monday. In Branch v. Smith [decision syllabus], the Court ruled in a complicated split decision that a federal court can redraw electoral boundaries when state redistricting procedures fail, and that federal judges correctly blocked a Mississippi state court redistricting plan that had favored Democrats. Justice Scalia wrote the Opinion [text], with a Concurrence by Justice Kennedy [concurrence text], a Concurrence by Justice Stevens [concurrence text], and Justice O'Connor and Justice Thomas [concurrence text] concurring in part and dissenting in part.
In Archer v. Warner [decision syllabus], the Court held that a debt for money promised in a settlement agreement accompanied by the release of underlying tort claims can amount to a debt for money obtained by fraud, not dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. s. 523(a)(2)(A). Justice Breyer wrote the Opinion [text], with a Dissent [text] by Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Stevens.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.