Supreme Court double jeopardy ruling Bernard Hibbitts at 1:17 PM ET
[JURIST] In a 5-4 split on Tuesday the US Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of a Pennsylvania man who had been tried twice for the same offense. Read Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania [decision syllabus] - Opinion by Scalia [opinion text], Concurrence by O'Connor [concurrence text] and Dissent by Ginsburg [dissent text]. David Sattazahn's first trial ended in jury deadlock over a death sentence, resulting in life imprisonment under PA law. He sought a retrial on unrelated grounds; the second jury sent him to death row. The Court ruled that with no previous acquittal neither the Fifth nor Fourteenth Amendments precluded Pennsylvania from seeking a death sentence for a second time. More on the case from the Associated Press [AP report] and the Medill School of Journalism, Northwestern University [case backgrounder].
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.