Maryland v. Shatzer, US Supreme Court, February 24, 2010 [holding that the Edwards v. Arizona prohibition against interrogation of a suspect who has invoked the Fifth Amendment right to counsel does not require suppression of statements if, after the suspect asks for counsel, there is a break of more than two years before resuming interrogation].
Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here. Latest commentary available here. JURIST has more on Fifth Amendment protections.
Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here. Latest commentary available here. JURIST has more on Fifth Amendment protections.
Leave a comment