Asbestos pain and suffering damages ruling [US SC]

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Hensley, US Supreme Court, June 1, 2009 [holding that the Tennessee Court of Appeals misapplied the Court's ruling in Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers in holding that an asbestosis sufferer may recover for pain and suffering related to fear of contracting lung cancer without specific jury instructions on the applicable standard]. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.


csx v thurston - Get more Business Documents

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://jurist.justia.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/29239

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ingrid Burke published on June 1, 2009 9:27 AM.

Mental competency for capital defendants ruling [US SC] was the previous entry in this blog.

General Motors bankruptcy materials [US BC] is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.