Ruling upholding nuns' conviction in missile case [10th Circuit]

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
US v. Platte; US v. Hudson; US v. Gilbert, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, March 17, 2005 [upholding convictions of three nuns for defacing a missile silo with their own blood in 2002]. Excerpt:
Of course, whenever a criminal statute has such a broad scope, some prohibited activities may be much less reprehensible than others. The maximum permissible sentence is designed for the most reprehensible offenses. The least reprehensible may be excused as a matter of prosecutorial discretion or may receive lighter sentences from the court. We would be ignoring this reality if we were to say that a statute was not intended to encompass conduct deserving significantly less than the maximum permissible sentence. Perhaps courts should recognize an exception to § 2155(a) for de minimis conduct. But Defendants' actions cannot be so characterized.
Read the full text of the opinion here. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://jurist.justia.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/28134

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on March 18, 2005 9:44 PM.

Schiavo emergency stay petition [US SC] was the previous entry in this blog.

Schiavo habeas denial [US DC] is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.