Ruling on burden of proving consumer confusion in trademark infringement [US SC]

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
KP Permanent Make-up Inc. v. Lasting Impression, United States Supreme Court per Justice Souter, December 8, 2004 [ruling that a company that had used the term "micro color" to describe its cosmetic product did not have the burden of showing that there was no likelihood of consumers confusing that product with a similarly-named product by another manufacturer alleging trademark infringement, but rather than the plaintiff manufacturer had the positive burden of showing that there was likely consumer confusion as a result of the practice]. Read the opinion here [PDF]. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Bernard Hibbitts published on December 8, 2004 7:49 PM.

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 [US Congress] was the previous entry in this blog.

Same-sex marriage reference [SC Canada] is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.