TIP: Enclosing your search terms in quotes may help you find better results.

Academic Commentary
11 Aug 2015
by Nancy Marcus of Indiana Tech Law School
edited by Elizabeth Dennis

JURIST Guest Columnist Nancy Marcus of Indiana Tech Law School discusses religious freedom in the US...In a recent battle between reproductive rights and religious freedom, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Stormans, Inc. v. Wiesman rejected claims brought by a pharmacy owner and two pharmacists seeking … [read more]


Student Commentary
3 Sep 2013

JURIST Guest Columnist Nicholas Caselli, University of Chicago Law School Class of 2015, discusses the circuit split created by Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp v. Sebelius and argues that the right of corporations to impose their religious beliefs was correctly denied..."For-profit, secular corporations cannot engage in religious exercise." With this sentence, … [read more]


Legal News
1 May 2008
by Mike Rosen-Molina

[JURIST] The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Thursday dismissed [opinion, PDF] an appeal of an injunction [PDF text; JURIST report] suspending a Washington state law that would require pharmacists to dispense Plan B emergency contraceptives [product backgrounder; JURIST news archive], the so-called "morning after" pill. US District Judge Ronald … [read more]


Legal News
9 Nov 2007
by Mike Rosen-Molina

[JURIST] A federal judge Thursday issued an injunction [PDF text] suspending a Washington state law that would require pharmacists to dispense Plan B emergency contraceptives [product backgrounder], the so-called "morning-after pill." US District Judge Ronald Leighton's injunction effectively creates a "refuse and refer" system, allowing pharmacists to refuse to sell … [read more]

Page 1 of 1

Latest Readers

@JURISTnews

Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.